Senate Committee Votes to Overturn FCC Cross-Media Ownership Rules
Both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are among the cosponsors of the measure that now heads to the full Senate
In a rare rebuke of the Federal Communications Commission, a Senate panel Thursday voted to throw out a new FCC rule allowing a newspaper to own a TV or radio station in the nation's Top 20 media markets. The effort was led by Sen. Byron Dorgan, a North Dakota Democrat highly critical of media concentration.
Now that the Senate Commerce Committee has voted, the measure goes to the full Senate. Dorgan's bill has 25 sponsors, including Sen. Hillary Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama, and he envisions passage in both the Senate and House, though President Bush has signaled he will veto it. Dorgan, speaking to reporters, said: "We have five or six major corporations in this country that determine, for the most part, what Americans see, hear, and read every day. I don't think that's healthy for our country." When asked about a tentative deal for Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. to buy a third major New York paper, Newsday, while also owning two New York City TV stations, Dorgan said it was "another example of concentration that I think is unhealthy." The corporation already owns the New York Post and Wall Street Journal , and, according to the FCC, owns the TV properties under waiver provisions. Dorgan said he doesn't buy the argument that the Internet and cable TV allow for many media voices, saying it's the "same ventriloquist" behind many media outlets. "Diverse, independent, and local media sources are essential to ensuring that the public has access to a variety of information," he added.
The controversy arose last December, when the FCC announced it was loosening restrictions, dating to 1975, on cross-media ownership. The new rule requires a newspaper acquiring a broadcast property in one of the top markets to meet certain criteria. If it buys a TV station, for example, there must be at least eight independently owned "major media voices" in the market after the purchase and the station must not be among the top four in the market. A "major media voice" is a large paper or TV station.
When the rule change was considered, the FCC split 3 to 2, with Republican commissioners favoring it and Democrats opposed. One Democrat said the rule change would "make George Orwell proud," referring to the author who famously wrote: "Big Brother is watching you."
FCC Chairman Kevin Martin, though, has defended the rule change as needed at a time when newspapers are struggling. At least 300 daily papers have stopped publishing during the past 30 years, and circulation and ad revenues have dropped precipitously in recent years at about half of all U.S. dailies, the FCC said December 18 in announcing the rule change. Dorgan counters that there's "nothing in Martin's job description that says he's the newspaper referee in America."
It's unusual for Congress to undo an agency rule. Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez waded into the controversy April 1. He wrote in a letter to Commerce Committee Chairman Daniel Inouye, a Hawaii Democrat, that the Bush administration "strongly opposes any attempt to overturn these rules by legislative means" and suggesting a veto would follow.
From Dorgan: "The president's popularity ratings are below 30 percent, and he promises to veto almost everything these days. My hope is that at some point, he'd decide on an issue like this that he wants to stand with the American people."
Reader Comments
Next up for Congressional overturn...NTIA analog/digital snafu
This is good to see, and I will love seeing the Bush-brat have a tantrum. Amazing that they are now trying to sneak through the telecom immunity attached to a war-funding bill...what fuc*ers!!
The NTIA scam that was part of the 2005 Deficit Reduction legislation needs the level of scrutiny this sly FCC consolidation law is getting.
Not over
The Senate Commerce Committee action is a postive step forward to help stem the tide of further media consolidation. Even before the threatened veto, passage in the Senate and House are not "done deals." Let's hope that all citizens who value open government and want to see a more active local media environment will write their congressional delegations NOW and express there view in clear and uncertain terms.
FCC
Like all Government Agencies, such as the USDA, the FDA, the FCC has too much power, and does a very poor job of policing those businesses under it's rule. If anyone was suprised at the promised veto from the "jackass" in the White House, we should not be. After all in the face of a terrorist attack we got "The Military Commissions Act."
Allowing such a consolidation of our media is bad for any government, especially for one calling itself a Democracy. This type of consolidation only stiffles speech, and there are many limits we as citizens know nothing about as is. Our Government is missing in action. Example, look at the fix the credit market in presently in. Speech is something we cannot be loose about. We need to be free people, not atomatons, who are brainwashed by the media. More consolidation will futher erode our rights, and control what we hear, and read.
As is special laws were put into place to allow an Austrialian to own media in this nation as. Enough is enough.
Add your thoughts
All comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.advertisement
