Iran Election Protests and Riots a Test for Obama
The disputed re-election of Ahmadinejad appears to have undermined Obama's argument for diplomacy
As protests and riots flare in Tehran and other cities in Iran after the bitter election there Friday, President Obama finds himself in a bind. The disputed re-election of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad appears to have undermined, at least for now, Obama's fundamental argument that outreach, diplomacy, and an emphasis on democratic values can move the Mideast closer to peace and move Iran away from its nuclear program.
Obama's theory of conciliation will now be tested as never before in his young presidency. Ahmadinejad's retaining power by apparently defeating reformer Mir Hossein Mousavi solidifies the hold of radical Islamic leaders and clerics on the government in Iran. The Ahmadinejad regime may have a stronger hand to intensify its level of confrontation with the United States and Israel. Ahmadinejad has denied the Holocaust, threatened Israel with obliteration, and been severely critical of the United States.
Vice President Joe Biden spoke carefully for the administration yesterday when he expressed "doubts" about the election results. He told NBC's Meet the Press that "we're going to withhold comment" until there is more information about Mousavi's charges that the election was rigged. But he added: "There's an awful lot of question about how this election was run. I mean, we're just waiting to see."
The Obama administration doesn't want to totally alienate Ahmadinejad because the West will have to continue dealing with him over very sensitive and explosive issues, including Iran's nuclear program, the status of Israel, and the overall peace process in the Mideast. In addition, administration officials don't want to be too critical of Ahmadinejad's victory because that might make the anti-Ahmadinejad reformers seem like puppets of the United States and weaken their position internally.
"Our interests are the same before the election as after the election," Biden said, "and that is, we want them to cease and desist from seeking a nuclear weapon and having one in its possession, and, secondly, to stop supporting terror."
Echoing Biden this morning, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters, "Obviously, we continue to have concern about what we've seen. Obviously, the Iranians are looking into this, as well. We continue to be heartened by the enthusiasm of young people in Iran. But I think what's important is the concerns that we have about their nuclear weapons program. And the concern we have about their support for terror isn't any different than it was on Friday."
Referring to the massive demonstrations supporting both Mousavi and Ahmadinejad since the disputed balloting, Biden said yesterday: "The fact is that there is clearly a debate going on among Iranians about Iran. It is not about us."
One person was reportedly killed and many were wounded in the street protests in Tehran today.
Reader Comments
Yes he did.
Reagan was stuck with the Cold War, Molly, and he held true to American standards in fighting tyranny and spreading freedom and democracy.
The allusion to 1984 was nice, but doesn't fit the historical facts. American may pressure and spy, but we do not control the lives of politicians in foreign governments or the lives of people that are not citizens. Ahmadinejad and the leader of N. Korea do this to their people, the US doesn't.
Iran's Election Protest
To make this comment short and sweet; We all feel for the people,but at this time,that is about all we can do. We have enough problems right here in our own backyard. Our plate is overflowing and before we can do anything else but sympathize,WE have to get a hold on our problems.I hope this doesn't come across as being selfish,just practical. We've played BIG BROTHER for to many countries only to have mud thrown in our faces. And to the person commenting on what President Regan said,REMEMBER, Regan wasn't left holding a bag like the one President Obama has! THINK ABOUT IT PEOPLE!!!
Lessons from history
President Reagan did not fear the Soviets when he voiced the country's concern of oppressed protestors in Poland and in other satellite countries. He didn't worry about accussations of meddling in "internal affairs". He stood up and told the world that America was going to stand behind free speech and free, democratic governments. But what does Obama do? Just the opposite, and he is going to hurt the relationship the US can have with Iran's people. He wants negotiation, he'll only get it from the protestors because the mollahs and company are not listening. He better learn from Reagan or he is going to continue hostilities between the US and Iran.
advertisement










