Obama's Battle With the Liberal Wing of the Democratic Party
There are some signs that Obama is starting to generate serious opposition from his own party
Four decades ago, the liberal, antiwar wing of the Democratic Party helped to force President Lyndon B. Johnson from office. Specifically, Johnson decided not to run for re-election in 1968 in large part because of rising primary challenges and increasingly vitriolic demonstrations against him. One chant that was heard often at anti-Vietnam War rallies was "Hey, hey, LBJ, how many kids did you kill today?"
The level of anger now is nowhere close to that level, but there are warning signs that President Obama is starting to generate serious opposition on the fiery left. There is increasing unease about his sending 21,000 more troops into Afghanistan, which some compare to the early escalations in Vietnam. There is disquiet that Obama has abandoned his promise to release photos showing brutal interrogations of suspected terrorists. There is consternation that he is moving toward using military tribunals to prosecute some terrorists, that he has not banned assault weapons, and that he has not acted aggressively enough to protect a woman's right to have an abortion. Many liberals are also unhappy that Obama shows no interest in a "single payer" healthcare system in which the government would take the lead in guaranteeing adequate medical treatment. Among the groups that have been ratcheting up their criticism of Obama are the American Civil Liberties Union, Amnesty International, Public Citizen, and members of the 77-member congressional Progressive Caucus.
But despite the disappointment in some quarters, most liberal Democrats have been giving President Obama a pass on his centrist policies, and he still enjoys high approval ratings from the public. The question is whether the overall patience of leaders and voters on the left will last much longer.
White House strategists express confidence that they can keep most liberals in line for the foreseeable future. One reason is that Americans on the left have such lengthy wish lists on issues ranging from healthcare reform to legalizing gay marriage. They don't want to create any permanent break with Obama.
And White House officials say this core of the Democratic Party, with some exceptions, will continue to give its president the benefit of the doubt. They point to a meeting that Obama held with the Progressive Caucus in late April. "It was very cordial," recalls one attendee. "The sense I got from that meeting was that there was a clear desire to work through their differences and try to find compromises. There were no flash points."
It appears that after eight years of a Republican in the White House, liberals are willing to muffle their dissent. "There is such an overriding sense of relief that it's Obama and not George W. Bush in the White House," says Geoff Garin, a veteran Democratic pollster. "There is a pretty strong inclination to cut him a lot of slack." Garin also says that liberals "may say he is not tough enough on the banks or that he's keeping the troops in [Iraq] too long and not delivering quickly enough on 'don't ask, don't tell' [to change policy and allow gays to serve openly in the military]. But they are still delighted and thrilled that he is president of the United States." It also helps in muting opposition that Obama and White House officials are reaching out regularly to inform liberal leaders of what Obama is doing and to get feedback. The president's speech Thursday defending his plans to close the Guantánamo Bay prison—a move that is widely supported on the left—was part of that outreach.
White House advisers add that Obama will be pushed only so far to the left, and with good reason. Only 19 percent of Americans, after all, identify themselves as liberal, compared with 36 percent who say they are moderate and 41 percent who say they are conservative, according to the latest poll by Democracy Corps, a Democratic think tank.
Still, the next few months will be a time of testing. How many compromises will Obama accept on healthcare and on legislation designed to limit global warming and reduce U.S. reliance on foreign oil? How far will he go in courting conservatives on issues ranging from national security to abortion? Is he sliding ever deeper into a morass in Afghanistan, as LBJ did in Vietnam early in his presidency?
- 1
- 2
- Next Page >
Reader Comments
we are in such big trouble
We must stop pointing fingers and blaming one another. This country is a mess and is in a no-win situation. We the american people with voting rights, and an interest in the outcome of this nation must quit blaming and begin working together to make this country what we want it to be. The devisiveness caused by one sector blaming another is what is preventing us americans from digging in and making things right. Instead of welfare, lets give out education credits. Instead of making it necessary to institute a national health care program, lets allow hospitals and doctors to treat what needs treated without fear of malpractice suits. Instead of pushing government involvement in the schools and education, lets let the teachers and parents figure out the way the education system should run. Give control back to the people. One person, one vote. No electoral congress, they simply allow special interest groups to choose who runs, and who gets elected. We need to reduce government involvement, not increase it. Who is going to buy those little gas-efficient 2-person cars the government is going to make GM produce? Not anyone with more than 1 child on a sports team, or more than one child period. Then GM becomes even more money in-efficient, and the cycle becomes larger.
The only way to fix this is for Americans to do what they have always done. PULL TOGETHER, despite differences in color, race, or creed. America is at stake. We must fix this mess and work together or the U.S.A. will be no more.
Nonsense
Step back into reality please. Iraq did not attack us. Neither did Afghanistan. The former leaders of Afghanistan (the Talibam) did not attack us either. So who really sees what the wars of today are about - you or the evil left?
What Obama Slipped Into The Supplemental Appropriations Bill Last Week
First we were promised that no longer would the wars be off budget. So much for that promise.
Text of H.R.2346 as Engrossed Amendment Senate Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 Making supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009, and for other purposes.
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h2346/text?version=eas&nid=t0:eas:700
Within that bill is an amendment, the new Graham-Lieberman secrecy law:
The White House is actively supporting a new bill jointly sponsored by Sens. Lindsey Graham and Joe Lieberman -- called The Detainee Photographic Records Protection Act of 2009 -- that literally has no purpose other than to allow the government to suppress any "photograph taken between September 11, 2001 and January 22, 2009 relating to the treatment of individuals engaged, captured, or detained after September 11, 2001, by the Armed Forces of the United States in operations outside of the United States." As long as the Defense Secretary certifies -- with no review possible -- that disclosure would "endanger" American citizens or our troops, then the photographs can be suppressed even if FOIA requires disclosure. The certification lasts 3 years and can be renewed indefinitely. The Senate passed the bill as an amendment last week.
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/06/01/photos/index.html
So much for CHANGE & transparency.
Obama's a fraud.
advertisement










