Obama's and Cheney's Dueling Realities on National Security
The two faced off on closing the prison at Guantánamo Bay and harsh interrogation techniques
It was a remarkable moment for Washington and the nation—the high-profile clash of two diametrically opposed visions of national security and how to keep America safe.
President Barack Obama, in a speech Thursday at the National Archives, described a world that is best handled with reason, restraint, and common sense, and where traditional American values of respect for the law, openness, and opposition to torture still matter.
On the other hand, former Vice President Dick Cheney, in a speech delivered at the American Enterprise Institute a few minutes after Obama's, painted a darker, more dangerous world, where policymakers must plan for the worst and where Americans must hunker down on a permanent war footing.
The immediate topic was Obama's plan to close the prison for suspected terrorists at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, which has become an international symbol for abuse of detainees. But the Obama-Cheney "debate" had a much wider focus: the terrorist threat and how to combat it. "I took an oath to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution as commander in chief, and as a citizen, I know that we must never, ever turn our back on its enduring principles for expedience sake," Obama said.
He also said George W. Bush's administration, though well intentioned, "made decisions based upon fear rather than foresight and all too often trimmed facts and evidence to fit ideological predispositions." As an example, he said 240 people at Guantánamo have "spent years in legal limbo." "We are cleaning up something that is, quite simply, a mess, a misguided experiment that has left in its wake a flood of legal challenges that my administration is forced to deal with on a constant basis, and that consumes the time of government officials whose time should be spent on better protecting our country," Obama said. But he didn't spell out precisely what would happen to all those detainees if Guantánamo closes. And this void was a big reason Congress, in a rebuke to Obama, rejected an $80 million appropriation for the prison's shutdown.
But Cheney said closing Guantánamo would be wrong, and he faulted Obama for announcing, shortly after taking office, that he would shutter the facility with "little deliberation and no plan." Cheney defended the Bush administration's antiterrorism policies, including the use of "enhanced interrogation techniques" such as waterboarding that Obama has called torture. Cheney said those methods generated important information about terrorist activities. The former vice president went on to portray two parallel universes. There is a choice between Bush's approach, which Cheney said has kept the country safe since 9/11, and the Obama approach, which Cheney said deals with 9/11 as an anomaly that it is "not sufficient to justify a sustained wartime effort. "Cheney said the two views represent "the great dividing line in our current debate over national security." On that, at least, both sides would probably agree.
- Read Obama's 12 Most Important Decisions.
- See photos of Obama abroad.
- See photos of the Obamas behind the scenes.
Reader Comments
keywords cialis
i4uEoy Perfect work!
Wukrskcw
HejRQR
Answers
The answers to your biased questions:
1. No.
2. Nothing.
3. Yes, since 9/11 was the pretext to invade sovereign countries, no more attacks on US soil were needed as long as the plan is proceeding.
4. More.
5. I would set to achieve the most results in the shorter time.
6. The fact that high-tech explosive/incendiary mixture has been found in the rubble of WTC collapses, and that the collapses of the 3 WTC towers (WTC 1,2,7) have 10 elements in common with controlled demolitions while having none of the elements of gravitational collapses.
7. No one.
8. None. But take notice that Guantonomo is not a detention facility based on the concept of "prisoners of war", but rather a concentration camp for "enemy combatants" where torture is the rule.
9. No.
10. No.
11. Spend all the time I can afford to expose the government lies on 9/11 terrorist attack which points us on the wrong enemy to fight.
12. No.
13. No.
14. No, if it would stop to that rather than invading countries to steal their resources and promoting the use of torture worldwide.
15. Yes, they think so, just like you do.
16. ...
17. No, I am fond of the rule of law on "conflict of interests" and into investigating all the contracts Halliburton got for Iraq reconstruction, from its former CEO Dick Cheney.
advertisement









