Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Nation

Auto Dealers: Cash for Clunkers a Needed Boost

The head of the auto dealers association says the program is a success

Posted August 21, 2009

The "cash for clunkers" program that lets consumers trade in an old vehicle for a rebate for a new, more fuel-efficient car, is ending on Monday. That's after it ran through its first $1 billion in the first four days of implementation, leading Congress to infuse it with another $2 billion infusion earlier this month. But even as the dust settles, some criticisms continue—including from dealers who say they're not being reimbursed by the government fast enough. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid even sent a letter to Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood Thursday, asking that the government step up the pace of the payments.

John McEleney is the chair of the Virginia-based National Automobile Dealers Association, which represents more than 90 percent of new-car dealers nationwide and lobbied hard for the program. He recently spoke to U.S. News about how dealers have been reacting to the program and what the problem was with reimbursements. Excerpts:

When NADA started lobbying for cash for clunkers, was there much resistance in Congress?

This one was pretty popular going in. Even with some of the conservative Democrats and Republicans, there was no real strong opposition to it, with a few exceptions. Nothing's easy these days in Washington. But this one seemed to make sense. On top of all the money that was put in the auto industry, this was a lot of money, but it was also small by comparison, and it had a direct impact.

What are some of the problems with the program?

The program initially, in the first week, was very cumbersome. It was hard to get through the website. The program was put together fairly quickly, and it's not something that the federal government's accustomed to, nor dealers, so it took a little while to get through the bureaucracy. Then there was a lot of concern if dealers were going to get reimbursed for the money they had advanced to customers. But we seem to have gotten past that.

What were the complications with the reimbursement process?

It was just a very labor-intensive, document-intensive application process. I think it went a little over the top in terms of trying to avoid abuse.

Has that improved?

It seems to be much better. The requirements have been relaxed a little bit. More importantly, they have put on a lot more people. They've got about twice the number of people working the phones and computers than they did initially.

How are dealers' inventories?

Inventories are quite low. We wish we had more to sell. But it's probably enough for the duration of this program, and vehicles are arriving every day.

You're a car dealer yourself. What has your personal experience been with the program?

Our response has been, I think, much like the national response. It's been very positive. We've had more souls, more traffic, more phone calls, more Internet leads, more interest, than we've seen in a year. People recognize it as a real value.

Are you worried that the program has artificially boosted short-term buying, only to set up a big sales drop later this year?

You always have that concern. Dealers have expressed that to me. After 9/11, GM and the other companies came out with zero-percent financing for the first time. That created a huge volume of sales, and there was a hangover from that. I think this is a little different. There is a tremendous amount of pent-up demand. We've been running at about 60, 65 percent of the sales rate compared to the previous year. The scrappage rate—the rate at which vehicles were being taken off the road—actually exceeded new-vehicle sales for the first time in history. That tells us that a lot of people are still in the market but, because of the overall economy, did not have confidence to proceed with a major purchase. So rather than pulling from the future, we might be driving back some sales that might have occurred in the fourth quarter of '08, in the first two quarters of '09.

Some critics have said that the program takes sales away from used car dealers. Are they annoyed?

There is some of that. A lot of these vehicles that are being crushed would have ended up in their inventories and would have been sold to some of their customers. There is some resistance there, certainly. But on a positive side, the used-car values have stayed quite high despite this, despite the fact that there's been an artificial stimulus for new vehicle sales. Ordinarily you'd expect used car values to drop, and that has not happened. So that's a good thing.

  • Print  |
  • Subscribe  |
  • |
  • |
  • Sphere: Related Content

Reader Comments

The President of the Automobile Assoc. says Cash for Clunkers is a great program

Great news flash. The auto dealers and the people that bought cars think "Cash for Clunkers" is a great program. That's a news scoop.

As a usual the small minority benefit from a foolish gov't program and the vast majority pay for it and the small minority can only say "it't too bad the inventories were low" or "our payments were slow in getting to us". Gee, maybe you should've been able to take the money out of my savings account like a debit card.

Success for several reasons

The benefits of this program far out-weigh any perceived detriments the critics can muster.

- Reduce dependence on foreign oil

- Supports a critical US industry from collapse

- Keeps people working rather than standing in unemployment line.

- Gave a shot in the arm to the U.S. economy.

Who is paying the bill

Cash for clunkers good program for dealers and consumers maybe. Where did the money come from? China. Who is paying the interest? And as always the American public covers the cost. What about the increased governmental cost, equipment, personnel and etc. How much is all of this costing? I know ask that ditz Senator Stabenow she may have an idea since she was push for the other 2 billion extension, what kind of Senator would vote for a bill with out reading it, well perhaps reading and understanding are 2 different things. Well Ms Stabenow how much has this fiasco cost the American people. Could we have an answer.

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

Crossword Puzzle

Do You Like Crosswords?

We've added a new feature to our weekly digital magazine: an exclusive crossword puzzle!

advertisement

Barack Obama

Obama's Inner Circle

Get to know close advisers, cabinet officials, and more.

Your Photos

President Barack Obama speaks about combat troop level reductions in Iraq as he addresses military personnel at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune.

Obama in Your Town

Has the president visited your town? Send your photos to obamaphotos@usnews.com, and we'll post our favorites online.

Courtesy Greg Meinert

Thousands cheer as Obama becomes the 44th president.

Your Inauguration Photos

Thanks for sending us such great shots from this historic event.


A baby kissing an Obama poster for Washington Whispers.

Your Campaign Photos

We asked to see your personal election pictures and you delivered.

Public Poll

Do you fear losing your job in this market?

View Results

Washington Whispers

Washington Whispers

Hillary for Vice President

The hot rumor in Washington is that the secretary of state will get a promotion.

advertisement

Put U.S. News on Your Site

Keep up with the latest headlines by adding our news widget to your website.
Get this widget ยป


Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.