Memos Describe CIA's Harsh Interrogation Program
Holder went further, telling the CIA that the government would provide free legal representation to its employees in any legal proceeding or congressional investigation related to the program, and would repay any financial judgment.
"It would be unfair to prosecute dedicated men and women working to protect America for conduct that was sanctioned in advance by the Justice Department," Holder said.
Obama said in his statement and a separate letter sent directly to CIA employees that the nation must protect their identity "as vigilantly as they protect our security."
Current CIA Director Leon Panetta said in a message to his employees: "CIA responded, as duty requires."
Panetta had been among those seeking to have more of the memos blacked out, according to a government official who declined to be identified because he was not authorized to release the information.
The CIA has acknowledged using waterboarding on three high-level terror detainees in 2002 and 2003, with the authorization of the White House and the Justice Department. Hayden said waterboarding has not been used since, but some human rights groups have urged Obama to hold CIA employees accountable for what they, and many Obama officials, say was torture.
The memos produced by the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel were released to meet a court-approved deadline in a lawsuit against the government in New York by the American Civil Liberties Union.
"It's impossible not to be shocked by the contents of these memos," ACLU lawyer Jameel Jaffer said. "The memos should never have been written, but we're pleased the new administration has made them public."
___
Associated Press writer Pamela Hess contributed to this report.
Reader Comments
PEOPLE, COME ON
Im 17 and I know that no matter what kind of "interrogation techniques" used against terrorist will not get any information out of them. If they are willing to DIE for their missions, do you really think threats such as execution, or torture are going to move these people? Of course not!
Now What?
So now that Pres. Obama has withdrawn the forms of torture/fact finding techniques that has been a part of our nation's history, how does HE propose to interrogate terrorist prisoners. What means will he let the CIA use to get the answers that will keep us safe. If it isn't somewhat brutal, if it isn't somewhat painful, the answers will not be forthcoming. In addition, terrorists expect this treatment if caught, and risk it anyway.
I can't bear the thought of torture. And I question whether there is sadism on the part of the torturer. I believe there often is. But this is not crucifixion, it's not the rack, it's not burning at the stake, it's not gutting a person who still lives after the gutting, it's not whipping, and it's not sawing the head off a man as a threat to other prisoners.
In retrospect then, interrogation has come a long way in treating prisoners to get answers. But waterboarding is horrendous.. Forcing difficult positions for long periods of time is cruel. Solitary confinement is horrible.
Tell me Pres. Obama, what DO we do?
Did they read it or not?
Did the people who are condeming these action read the memos front to back, like they did with the AIG bonuses. I thought the CIA did more then just waterboarding. At least Bush took steps to keep us safe, right.
advertisement









