Voters Deadlocked on Same-Sex Marriage Ban in California
California voters seem to have shifted in recent weeks on the proposition to ban same-sex marriage
SAN FRANCISCO—The red-hot issue of same-sex marriage continues to sharply divide Californians, according to a poll conducted last week. If a vote were held today on Proposition 8, a state ballot initiative that would reverse the decision of the state's Supreme Court earlier this year and eliminate the right of same-sex couples to marry, 48 percent of likely voters say they would vote yes, supporting a ban, while 45 percent say they would vote to leave the law alone. Seven percent of voters remain undecided. The initiative, which will appear on the ballot in two weeks, requires a majority to pass.
Pollsters caution that the poll may not be a perfect measure of where California voters currently stand on the issue. "Polling on ballot measures in general is an inexact science, and polling on homosexuality in general is a tricky business," says a description of the SurveyUSA poll, which has a margin of error of 4 percentage points. "SurveyUSA urges all who examine these results to not put too fine a point on the 3 points that separate 'Yes' and 'No' today."
As television advertisements for and against Prop 8 have begun to flood the airwaves here over the past month, garnering almost as much attention as the presidential race, it has become increasingly clear that California voters remain deeply divided on same-sex marriage. In a half-dozen separate polls conducted over the past month, likely voters have been deadlocked on Proposition 8 each time. Through September, supporters of same-sex marriage appeared to be ahead by more than 5 points. But over the past several weeks, as the first pro-Prop 8 advertisements began to appear on TV—drawing criticism from legal experts, who have said their claims about same-sex marriage's impact on churches' tax exemptions and public-school education are misleading—the polls began to swing the other way.
In 2000, more than 60 percent of California voters approved a measure with wording similar to the initiative on this year's ballot. That law, which defined marriage as between a man and a woman, was challenged on constitutional grounds after Gavin Newsom, the mayor of San Francisco, began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples in the wake of the legalization of gay marriage in Massachusetts. The state Supreme Court ruled the law unconstitutional earlier this year.
Newsom, meanwhile, has become an unwilling poster child for the campaign to ban same-sex marriage, which features him in some of its hardest-hitting advertisements. In one widely aired spot, Newsom, standing before a cheering crowd after the court's decision was announced, declares that same-sex marriage is coming to California "whether you like it or not."
As of last week, Protect Marriage, the group leading the campaign in support of the ban, had raised more than $26 million from more than 64,000 donors, many of them from outside the state. Members of the Mormon church have accounted for about 40 percent of those donations. According to the SurveyUSA poll, 73 percent of likely Republican voters in the state support a same-sex marriage ban.
Same-sex marriage proponents have struggled to keep pace both in donations and on the air, raising less than $20 million. But as more polls have begun to show support for same-sex marriage faltering, donations have increased rapidly. Nearly 60 percent of likely Democratic voters say they intend to vote no on Prop 8. Last week, television personality Ellen Degeneres, who married her longtime partner earlier this year, began running her own anti-Prop 8 advertisement, which she is paying for herself.
Same-sex couples have begun flooding San Francisco's City Hall with requests for marriage licenses, fearing they may not be able to marry after November 4.
Reader Comments
I'm a little confused
This whole same sex marriage thing is not a new thing. I was once against do to the religious aspect of it. I then concidered the fact that if god is against let him judge. Who are we to judge. Allow them do what they want as far as getting married. Of that is the path they choose then so be it.
California a yes to Pop 8
For all the homosexuals out there, I know about your pain and I can imagine your sorrow. But to be honest, I'm a defender for how everything was used to be, just how God ordained it for us to be. We mess the whole thing up and say things about legal rights. But not everything what you think is good is right. All things are lawful on to me, but not all things are profitable.
Goodness is love choosing and faithfulness is love keeping His word. Just the fact that you are opposing same sex marriages, will not say that you are intolerant. Sometimes you have to make decisions which are very sorrowful for certain groups, but at the end it turned to be a wise decision for the good of many.
I’m not a homophobic or a religious person or whatever you could name it.
But it was said that marriage didn’t believe to man on the first place. Marriage was written in the Bible as a commitment between male and female. Everyone is speaking about legal rights and a free country.
But we can’t afford to use marriage on a way to please certain groups. It is originated as an institution and commitment between husband and wife. Who have their sexual intercourse within their marriage. I’m glad that the Californians choose with their hearts and made a wise decision. I hope that this outcome will also flow to Europe, because I know that many gay people are delivered from their homosexuality by the mighty hand of God.
An acquaintance of mine seems to be born as a homosexual and had a lover for 12 years.
Came to repentance, he converted himself from his sexual behaviour and turned to God. Jesus delivered him and saved him by His precious blood. There are two more gay people who gave their lives to Jesus Christ. Being gay didn’t come by nature. It’s bondage and in the name of Jesus they can be delivered and they can all change their life styles. If they submit themselves to God and pray for a healing, they will receive an answer from heaven.
I don’t judge gays but I reject the action itself, which is sin. Just as adultery or stealing from other people is wrong thing to do also.
Don’t get me wrong here, but I know that we have to draw a line somewhere. They can be domestic partners and live on a partnership with each other. To conceive children is also only possible for a man and a woman. And that people remarry all the time should also be limited. The marital agreement is a lifetime commitment and there are some demands that you must fulfil before you can marry. If everybody turned to be gay, the human race would be gone in a little while.
Federal Courts
The Gay/Lesbian community claims discrimination and civil rights violations. Well then, file the case in Federal Courts where this issue belongs under the Civil Rights Act. They are doing a disservice to the rest of the nation's gay/lesbian community if they don't. But the reality is pretty obvious that the Gay/Lesbian Community does not want to take this route because they already know beforehand that they will lose. Where's the justice then?
advertisement









