A Conference of Anglican Leaders Confronts Deeply Divisive Issues
Actions by the U.S. Episcopal Church test the durability of the Anglican Communion
It was not the most joyous of starts for the Lambeth Conference, the once-every-10-year gathering of the bishops of the 77 million-member Anglican Communion in Canterbury, England. Speaking last Sunday at the formal opening ceremony in the city's storied cathedral, the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Most Rev. Rowan Williams, observed that the global association of Anglican churches, including the Episcopal Church of the United States, faced the most serious challenge of its history.

The absence of roughly one fourth of the Communion's 880 invited bishops underscores his words. It reflects the growing schism between conservative and liberal factions with strongly differing views on tradition, doctrine, and Scripture, particularly as they touch on the hot-button issues of homosexuality and women in the clergy.
The scholarly archbishop had sought to design a conference that would be as healing as the last one proved divisive. Under the aegis of Williams's predecessor, the Most Rev. George Carey, the 1998 conference passed resolutions denouncing the practice of homosexuality and advising against the blessing of same-sex unions or the ordination of any member of a same-sex union. Seen as a triumph of the more conservative voices of the Communion, many hailing from African provinces that now boast the largest Anglican followings in the world, the resolutions were put to a test when Gene Robinson, an openly gay clergyman, was consecrated as bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of New Hampshire in 2003.
In response, Anglican primates at various gatherings called on the U.S. bishops to reconsider their actions, even threatening the expulsion of the American church from the Communion. But when the U.S. church issued only vague assurances that it would not do the same again—assurances that some say will not be upheld—conservative Anglican leaders stepped up their protests. Archbishop Peter Akinola of Nigeria and other leaders of "Southern Cone" Anglican provinces asserted that they could no longer remain in fellowship with those parts of the Communion that ignored "orthodox" teaching, whether on homosexuality or the qualifications for priesthood or the accepted truths of Scripture.
And many conservative Episcopalians, outraged by the direction of their church, led congregations out of American dioceses, reorganizing them either as independent churches or as part of foreign Anglican jurisdictions. Established in 2005, for instance, the Convocation of Anglicans in North America consists of some 60 congregations that became a missionary extension of the Church of Nigeria. The Rt. Rev. Martyn Minns, a former rector of Truro Church in Fairfax, Va., a breakaway congregation, was consecrated as CANA's missionary bishop in 2006.
But growing resistance to the hierarchy of the Anglican Communion took most forceful expression in the Global Anglican Future Conference, held in Jerusalem only weeks before the opening of Lambeth. While its organizers insisted that theirs was not a counter-Lambeth, the meeting of 1,148 lay and clergy participants (including some 300 bishops and archbishops) produced a final statement that proclaimed a "fellowship of confessing Anglicans" opposed to the promotion of a "different" or "false" Gospel.
Since the main promoters of that false Gospel were the American and Canadian churches, the statement declared, and since the Communion's top hierarchy chose to ignore the objections of the majority of the Communion, particularly those coming from the "Southern Cone," the framers of the statement claimed that the only possible conclusion was that "we are a global Communion with a colonial structure."
The authors went on to declare that a torn Communion could not easily be mended. But they also said that confessing Anglicans would remain within the Communion, though no longer acknowledging the power of the Archbishop of Canterbury to determine Anglican identity. That identity, they said, was to be demonstrated through adherence to 14 tenets of orthodoxy, including "the unchangeable standard of Christian marriage between one man and one woman as the proper place for sexual intimacy and the basis of the family."
Such tenets, says theologian and GAFCON attendee Os Guinness, are nothing more or less than what the great Christian writer and apologist C. S. Lewis called "mere Christianity."
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next Page >
Reader Comments
Division in the Anglican Church
The issue here is God's sovereignty and the Bible as his word. Do we believe that it is inerrant and the only standard of living on this world? If we do, and we study it from Genesis to Revelation, we will find the answer to all of these issues within the total context, without cherrypicking certain scriptures out of context to make it mean whatever we want it to mean. Most of these issues have been settled according to the word of God for centuries, and it is certain groups with political and immoral agendas that are questioning the orthodoxy of Christianity at this late date. Ultimately, you have to convince God he is wrong if your position is different than what is clearly illustrated in the Bible in toto.
Anglicans Angst
As a practicing ecumenical Methodist, I feel for my Anglican brothers/sisters in their time of testing. But a believing Christian cannot 'cherry pick' the Bible, or use Christ's message to re-order society. No church, Catholic or Protestant would ever deny the basic sacraments to it's member, whatever their lifestyle. But Christianity historically, as with the other major religions has condemned homosexuality, period. There is NO scientific explanation for this problem as yet. Until one surfaces, I feel only pity for those whose affliction prevents them from full contact with the other half of humanity, like a person born with only one leg. But their disability, preference, whatever cannot be held religiously as equal to a hetereosexul couple. Civil unions, yes, marriage and tax benefits, no.
Some things are not negotiable.
First, I am not an Anglican.
However, some things are not negotiable, regardless of demonination, such as basics like how we are saved (by faith and REPENTANCE) and morality, and we should have learned that (Hebrews 5:12-6:1).
Read the letters to Pergamum and Thyatira(Rev 2:12-29). These, and the other five letters as well, were written to the church, not to Anglicans, Baptists, Episcopalians, Catholics, Methodists, or any other denomination. God's Word applies to ALL of us.
Some want to justify their errant lifestyle by using their own interpretation of the Bible. Might get by with that in this world, but definitely will not in the next.
advertisement









