Excerpts From Friend-of-Court Briefs
The D.C. gun case exposes strange bedfellows and internal rifts in the administration
"It would be fundamentally perverse to transform this provision, designed to protect state interests against federal interference, into a federal restriction on traditional state regulatory powers.
"While we agree with the District that the Second Amendment protects not private rights but rather militia-linked rights, the position we urge is important if the Court should hold that there is a private right protected against federal interference. Further, we submit that even if the Second Amendment applies to state and local governments, it does not preclude handgun bans, such as those enacted by the District and Chicago."
- < Previous Page
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Reader Comments
Gun Control
I support the right for an individual to own a gun. Although I do not own a gun myself, I believe the second amendment should countinue to protect that right, and any outrageous limitations would certainly infringe on the Founding Father's initial idea. However, I believe the right was intended for law-abiding citizens, not those who abuse priviliges.
Second Amendment
The Second Amendment does not grant a right to bear arms. It merely protects the right which is the individual's by virtue of his being human. An individual right to bear arms exists irrespective of government. An individual human being has the right to his life. He therefore has the right to defend his life. And it follows that he also has the right to the means necessary to defend his life. An Individual can delegate his self-defense right to a government, but does not surrender that right. In emergency situations, eg. when there is no time to call the police, an individual has the right to use deadly force to defend himself against an aggressor. A gun is often the best tool to use in defense of his life.
Gun Control
I am sure that the Founding Fathers meant that individuals can bear arms. There is definitely a need to put controls on bearing arms because like anything else, there are always a few people who will push the limits and take things out of control. However, I think that it is an infringement on our rights as citizens of the United States to say that we cannot have guns. There is no need to take something that is necessary away because of the people who misuse it.
advertisement
