What Obama Didn't Say in His 18-Month Iraq Withdrawal Timetable
In announcing an August 2010 exit date for U.S. combat troops, Obama left a few things unspoken
President Obama's announcement of an 18-month timeline today for withdrawing U.S. combat forces from Iraq included a notable nod to his U.S. military commanders. "Let there be no doubt," he acknowledged during a visit to Camp Lejeune, N.C. "Iraq is not yet secure." He added that "too many fundamental questions remain unresolved."
No one is more aware of this point than the U.S. military. President Obama's plan to bring U.S. troops home ultimately represents a compromise between top U.S. military commanders on the ground in Iraq—who pushed for a slower-than-16-month timeline while warning the president and his advisers that Iraq could still backslide into violence—and those within the administration and on Capitol Hill who were backing a speedier withdrawal.
The military's biggest cause for concern was left unmentioned during Obama's speech. Within the halls of the Pentagon, the talk these days often turns to the worrisome tensions between Kurds and Arabs in Iraq. Both groups continue to vie for power, particularly in the still-volatile northern regions of Kirkuk and Mosul.
Indeed, a number of senior military commanders cite the potential for Arab-Kurdish violence as the greatest challenge that Iraq now faces. There are also considerable worries that the Iraqi Ministry of Defense is continuing to drag its feet on the matter of integrating Kurdish forces into Iraq's national army.
Military analysts are emphasizing one element of Obama's plan that they hope will buy U.S. forces more time to help resolve these concerns. By August 2010, the U.S. combat mission in Iraq will end. But "combat" mission is the key.
The Status of Forces Agreement signed late last year already stipulates that U.S. combat forces have to be out of all Iraqi cities by June of this year. In response, Gen. Raymond Odierno, the commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, last year said that U.S. troops would continue their work as "trainers" at the joint security stations that they share with Iraqi counterparts in cities throughout the country. Though they are combat troops in many regards, calling these U.S. forces "trainers" allows them to stay in the cities and continue to work with Iraqi security forces.
These security stations were a vital element of the surge strategy, and they are widely credited with helping to control violence in the cities. While U.S. combat troops must be out by mid-2010, up to 50,000 U.S. troops are expected to stay in a training capacity until December 2011.
With Obama's announcement today, however, U.S. military commanders note that the clock has begun ticking. Now, they add, the hard work of implementing the withdrawal plan begins.
- Read more news on Iraq.
Reader Comments
Iraq
Nero fiddled while Rome burned!
Troops In Iraq Until We Learn Our Lesson
The reason different regions want to be separately controlled is they want more control over their lifestyle. The solution is to create a lifestyle that can please all parties. The biggest obstacle the USA faces, is that it does not honor God's word, but lifts up people's freedoms above the word of God. Our indecency, immodesty and immorality stand in our way, blocking our efforts.
The solution is found in returning to the word of God to all prophets. None of Iraq or America's regions are living according to the word of God. God warns against debt, interest, insurance and seeking riches and honor; we are going the wrong way and exporting the wrong system. If we turn them back to God's word to them, we will find God is the God of the whole world. The Qur'an says to follow the whole Bible. Moses and Jesus said to live by every word of God. The Bible is a Puranas for the Hindus. There can be unity among all sections of Iraq, if we wanted God's word to rule.
O'Bama's plans for military withdrawl from Iraq...
It is all too apparent that insufficient strategy for this withdrawl did not include plans for suggestions for solutions regarding the ongoing conflict betwixt Kurds and Arabs. A conflict very similar to that between Arabs and the nation of Israel. Specifically, such conflicts seem to be part of human nature. "I want my own country and we will go to any lengths to get it" is the sort of mind-set so prevelant in third world countries.
What can be said? Did not the United States have similar beginnings? So, suggestions? Who among us can wiggle ourselvs into a respectable position to help negotiate some kind of peace between Kurds and Arabs? Because it sure doesn't work with Arabs and Israelis...it's like on once, then off-again at the drop of another missle fired into your neighbor's yard.
advertisement










