Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Energy and Environment

A China-U.S. Partnership on Global Warming

Experts say there is room to collaborate on new technologies

Posted June 3, 2009

Meeting with officials in China last week, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said little about human rights, a topic on which she has been notably vocal in the past, and instead focused on one of the big hurdles the United States faces in trying to tackle climate change: making sure China cooperates.

Pelosi has been working the U.S. side of the issue on the Hill. The House energy committee recently passed a 900-plus-page, hotly negotiated bill that would require cuts in U.S. greenhouse gas emissions starting in 2012. But the situation abroad is murkier. In December, world leaders will gather in Copenhagen to try to cobble together a new treaty on global greenhouse gas emissions. One key question is how far China and the United States, the world's two biggest energy consumers, will go to cut their pollution.

China says rich, developed countries (which it does not consider itself to be) should cut their emissions by 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2020. That's unrealistic: Last week's bill called for only a 17 percent cut below 2005 levels. For that matter, China's position on global warming isn't entirely clear. It will not agree to binding emissions cuts, and a 2008 report in Science found that China was building the equivalent of two coal-fired power plants per day. But this divide may not be intractable. "China has staked out a very tough position upfront: We are not going to commit to caps," says Jonathan Adams, assistant director of the Initiative for U.S.-China Cooperation on Energy and Climate. "But it's a position. It doesn't tell you what they are already doing."

Last November, China enacted its own $585 billion stimulus plan, which had tens of billions for energy efficiency and low-carbon rail projects. Since 2006, it has been working—with success—to reduce the amount of energy it consumes per unit of gross domestic product by 20 percent by 2010. And it has readied itself for a boom in low-carbon technologies: It is already a leader in developing advanced nuclear reactor technology and is about to become the world's biggest market for wind power equipment.

Part of the trick in negotiating with the Chinese, experts say, is understanding that they think about emissions in a different way, as "a problem of near-term negative human health," says Mike Davis of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. "When we talk about CO2, the Chinese want to talk about mercury, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and so forth." So, Davis says, there's an opportunity for the two countries to collaborate on new technology for coal-fired power plants that would capture all those pollutants. As Pelosi noted in Beijing, the two countries "have a responsibility to ourselves, to our people, and to the world to work together on this." In response, Prime Minister Wen Jiabao agreed in Copenhagen "to push for positive results," but he offered no new concessions.

Of course, many of those technologies are still decades away. And while the world economy sputters, first-quarter car sales in China hit a record high.

Reader Comments

Lkdfjgqf

YNTMei

China not wanting to cap GHG emissions

For many industries, China practices cheap labour prices and because of that they have powered themselves at a point where we can't have local products price competitive, even after transportation of their products onto America's soil.

We will have to cut our own GHG emissions, it's okay, but not to the end of not being able to win our own lives because no work available. With no work available, there will be only some schemes:

1- No money, no candy. We won't be able to purchase any goods or services, even from China. Then, China will pursue its economical difficulties because unable to reopen their closed facilities. World economical crisis will continue over decades.

2- If we continue to work,this will be because of institution of fees for out of America's soil goods. No importation will create jobs, but prices will increase for all Americans. Inflation will be at our doors and what will happen after? Still economic crisis for decades.

3- We trick artificially global economy by entering in a deflation process. Salaries will decrease and even consumption. Job will be lost all around the planet.

So which is the solution at the end to protect Americans for pollution leakage and Chinese from economic stagnation or even decrease? It seeme that it is still on negociation aiming to do both.

Global warming

Simple,Stop consuming the products of the country in question.If we live within are borders,this country would be prosperous.The pursuit of China;China can do anything it wants.How much money do we owe them,anything we buy in this country,comes from that region.So to me this is like beating a dead horse:health care to me also falls under that catagory.

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Today

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

advertisement

Public Poll

Do you believe that global warming is happening?

View Results

Washington Whispers

Washington Whispers

Donors Appreciate Bush

The fundraising campaign has kicked into high gear.

Sponsored Poll

What factor do you think is responsible for the majority of teen-driving crashes?

View Results

Put U.S. News on Your Site

Keep up with the latest headlines by adding our news widget to your website.
Get this widget »


advertisement

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.