Monday, November 9, 2009

Energy and Environment

Oil Drilling Debate Rages on, 20 Years After the Valdez Spill

President Obama has an unusual opening to shape the nation's offshore drilling policy

Posted March 24, 2009

Twenty years ago today, the oil tanker Exxon Valdez ran into a reef in southern Alaska's Prince William Sound, after its crew, hoping to dodge breakaway ice from a nearby glacier, steered it out of the tanker lanes. More than 11 million gallons of oil were spilled in the crash, triggering one of the worst ecological disasters in U.S. history.

The oil tanker Exxon Valdez.
The oil tanker Exxon Valdez.

The disaster was a catalyst for major changes within the oil industry. Congress quickly passed tougher safety laws, and oil companies gradually adopted more advanced technology. Today, these improvements are one of the main pieces of evidence politicians cite for opening new areas of the U.S. coastline to drilling. Nevertheless, as most politicians and industry executives admit, the environmental risks have not been—and cannot be—eliminated completely.

Now the Obama administration is being forced to enter into this debate. First, there's the ongoing discussion about whether to open Alaska's oil-rich Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to drilling. A similar question lingers over potentially oil-rich areas off the nation's coastlines.

Because restrictions on oil drilling on the outer continental shelf were lifted last year—first by President Bush, then by Congress—President Obama arguably has more freedom and leeway than any other president in the past quarter century to shape the country's oil drilling policy. And yet, as developments in the decades since the Valdez spill illustrate, there are difficult realities—economic, environmental, and security related—that still have to be weighed.

On one hand, significant, real-life safety reforms have been adopted since the accident. In 1990, Congress passed the Oil Pollution Act, requiring oil tankers in the region to have double rather than single hulls (making them more resistant to penetration and reducing the volume of potential spills by up to 60 percent). The last single-hull boat is expected to go out of service by 2012, says Stan Jones of the Prince William Sound Regional Citizens' Advisory Council. Meanwhile, a pair of escort tugboats now helps all tankers navigate through treacherous waters, and tankers have been outfitted with GPS technology to enable the Coast Guard to track them.

Anecdotally, these changes appear to have prevented accidents: Since the early 1990s, there have been at least half a dozen incidents in which tankers experienced propulsion troubles or strayed from their lanes in Prince William Sound and needed tugboat assistance to be taken back to safety. In one case, in 1995, a tanker came within half a ship length of grounding. Such cases illustrate both the progress and unavoidable peril of transporting oil in cold water.

A similar question of risk comes up with oil exploration itself. As far back as 2000, an Energy Department report found that "new technology is delivering...more efficient recovery of oil and gas resources, smaller footprints, and cleaner, safer operations." Much of the improvement involves new rigs and drilling techniques, in particular horizontal or directional drilling that allows companies to extract more oil with fewer wells.

But such technologies have their limits. In 2006, a report for members of Congress who were looking at drilling along the coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge noted that, despite technological advances, "it is unlikely that full development of the Coastal Plain could be accomplished from a single compact site." Rather, it said, "development could require a dispersed network of drill pads, roads, pipelines, gravel mines, and other structures," with impacts potentially lasting decades.

And then there is the matter of actual spills. Behind the chants of "drill, baby, drill," this became something of an issue in last year's presidential campaign, when Sen. John McCain, calling for more drilling, argued that Hurricanes Rita and Katrina caused "no significant spillage." The truth, it turns out, is not so clear cut. According to the Interior Department, the two hurricanes together caused 165 spills, although there were no shoreline or wildlife effects.

  • Print  |
  • Subscribe  |
  • |
  • |
  • Sphere: Related Content

Reader Comments

We need to be able to drill

I received a recent letter from my congressman. It said we need to be independent of oil sheiks, and stop giving money to our enemies. The only way to be independent is to put all options on the table. This includes drilling for oil, natural gas, the bad word nuclear, clean coal and other alternative sources.

I am sick and tired of the environmentalist dictating a return to the stone age. The only way they will be happy is that way. Well the majority of Americans do not want a return to the stone age. They believe all options should be explored for our benefit. Since when do the few decide for the many?

We often hear how we are going to lose one species or another. If an organism isn't able to adapt then it should become extinct, and let another organism develop to fill the void. Are our environmentalists playing God? Possibly? According to Darwin things must adapt to their environment in order to survive. Adaptations give species the most viability.

Sometimes environments change quickly and species, which do not adapt, become extinct. Over 90% of the species that have been on this planet have become extinct. The heartiest survive, because they can rapidly adapt. Stagnation prevents change, and actually hinders natural selection.

Right now we have a proposal in front of congress. It is our energy bill, which will increase the cost of energy for every U S citizen. Al Gore got to testify in front of the House of Representatives. A scientist who would have destroyed his argument with actual science was denied testimony. Our elected officials did not want to see poor Al be embarrassed by actual science.

If you want actual facts on AWG they are not all in right now. If you want cheap energy in order to get our economy growing, then all options need to be used. While we do need to lower our dependence on fossil fuels, it should not be done by people who need to get re-elected. It should be done by open debate with actual science.

We need to be able to drill

I received a recent letter from my congressman. It said we need to be independent of oil sheiks, and stop giving money to our enemies. The only way to be independent is to put all options on the table. This includes drilling for oil, natural gas, the bad word nuclear, clean coal and other alternative sources.

I am sick and tired of the enviromentalist dictating a return to the stone age. The only way they will be happy is that way. Well the majority of Americans do not want a return to the stone age. They believe all options should be explored for our benefit. Since when do the few decide for the many?

We often hear how we are going to lose one species or another. If an organism isn't able to adapt then it should become extinct, and let another organism develop to fill the void. Are our enviromentalist playing God? Possibly? According to Darwin things must adapt to their enviroment in order to survive. Adaptations give species the most viability.

Sometimes enviroments change quickly and species, which do not adapt, become extinct. Over 90% of the species that have been on this planet have become extinct. The most hearty survive, because they can rapidly adapt. Stagnation prevents change, and actually hinders natural selection.

Right now we have a proposal infront of congress. It is our energy bill, which will increase the cost of energy for every U S citizen. Al Gore got to testify infront of the House of Representatives. A scientist who would have destroyed his arguement with actual science was denied testimoney. Our elected officials did not want to see poor Al be embarrased by actual science.

If you want actual facts on AWG they are not all in right now. If you want cheap energy in order to get our economy growing, then all options need to be used. While we do need to lower our dependence on fossil fuels, it should not be done by people who need to get re-elected. It should be done by open debate with actual science.

We need to be able to drill

I received a recent letter from my congressman. It said we need to be independent of oil sheiks, and stop giving money to our enemies. The only way to be independent is to put all options on the table. This includes drilling for oil, natural gas, the bad word nuclear, clean coal and other alternative sources.

I am sick and tired of the enviromentalist dictating a return to the stone age. The only way they will be happy is that way. Well the majority of Americans do not want a return to the stone age. They believe all options should be explored for our benefit. Since when do the few decide for the many?

We often hear how we are going to lose one species or another. If an organism isn't able to adapt then it should become extinct, and let another organism develop to fill the void. Are our enviromentalist playing God? Possibly? According to Darwin things must adapt to their enviroment in order to survive. Adaptations give species the most viability.

Sometimes enviroments change quickly and species, which do not adapt, become extinct. Over 90% of the species that have been on this planet have become extinct. The most hearty survive, because they can rapidly adapt. Stagnation prevents change, and actually hinders natural selection.

Right now we have a proposal infront of congress. It is our energy bill, which will increase the cost of energy for every U S citizen. Al Gore got to testify infront of the House of Representatives. A scientist who would have destroyed his arguement with actual science was denied testimoney. Our elected officials did not want to see poor Al be embarrased by actual science.

If you want actual facts on AWG they are not all in right now. If you want cheap energy in order to get our economy growing, then all options need to be used. While we do need to lower our dependence on fossil fuels, it should not be done by people who need to get re-elected. It should be done by open debate with actual science.

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

Crossword Puzzle

Do You Like Crosswords?

We've added a new feature to our weekly digital magazine: an exclusive crossword puzzle!

advertisement

Public Poll

Do you think the U.S. should drill offshore?

View Results

Washington Whispers

Washington Whispers

Irony in Jarrett Trip to Chamber of Commerce

Adviser Jarrett should watch for trap doors at Chamber of Commerce, a group she has slapped.

Put U.S. News on Your Site

Keep up with the latest headlines by adding our news widget to your website.
Get this widget ยป


advertisement

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.