Energy Secretary Steven Chu Faces Tough Menu of Choices
Obama's energy secretary will lead his renewable energy and climate change agenda—and he's not alone
Previewing the challenges awaiting him at the Department of Energy, Steven Chu recently said, "What the world does in the coming decade will have enormous consequences that will last for centuries. It's imperative that we begin without further delay." Quoting William Faulkner's 1950 Nobel Prize acceptance speech, he added, "Man will not merely endure; he will prevail."
That's heavy stuff for a first press conference, but given the full scope of the tasks before him, it's not really hyperbole, either. As the country's new energy secretary, Chu, himself a Nobel Prize-winning physicist, takes over not only the DOE's traditional responsibilities—protecting nuclear weapons and cleaning up radioactive waste—but also new ones of special importance to President Barack Obama, such as achieving rapid breakthroughs on renewable energy and helping address climate change.
The question is, where does Chu start? Certainly he won't be the only person in the administration working to transform how the nation uses energy. He'll be joined by veterans like Carol Browner, the new climate czar. But the precise nature of their balance of power remains undetermined.
There are some clues, however, about what Chu will be tackling in his first few months. The economic stimulus package under consideration in Congress will most likely include at least $100 billion of energy-related incentives, ranging from funding for "clean coal" demonstration projects to money for basic scientific research. Many projects will fall to the DOE to manage. "With the stimulus, [Congress and Obama] expect the money to get out the door quickly, and it's not that easy to get money out the door," says James Glotfelty, a former director of DOE's Office of Electric Transmission and Distribution. Once the stimulus bill is signed, Chu's agency will have to solicit and review bids to ensure that the money goes to the best candidates, he says.
That challenge, in turn, will put pressure on Chu and the Obama administration to move quickly on yet another front: appointing deputies and under secretaries to fill out the Energy Department and head specific programs. Their choices will offer an early indication of how much the DOE's mission might change under Obama. More deputies with strong research backgrounds like Chu's would signal a new focus on science and technology—as would a larger research budget.
Such shifts could help lay the technological groundwork for a broader effort to address climate change. But the extent of Chu's role in making policy decisions is still unclear. "The first real visible test will be what role DOE plays in the leading up to Copenhagen," the site of next December's major climate change conference, says Guy Caruso, former head of DOE's Energy Information Administration. "Browner will certainly have a big role in climate, and Hillary Clinton laid down the marker during her confirmation hearing. So if you are looking for one issue that tests the combination of how these players work out, this is a good one."
One thing that appears unlikely to change is how much the DOE spends on nuclear security and cleanup, which are seen as too crucial to cut.
Reader Comments
Oil Taxation for Secretary of Energy: Steven Chu
Secretary Chu,
Many of the proposed tax changes will hurt the Independent Oil and Gas Producer, who drill solely here in the United States to make us less dependent on foreign oil. Without being able to benefit from tax deductions like other industries they will have to severely scale back their operations and risk adding hundreds-of-thousands more unemployed workers.
My family has been operating a small Oil and Gas Producing Company for three
generation. Please consider the consequences of your tax proposals on the SMALL family owned businesses. It could be disastrous.
Regards,
Linda Atchinson McCabe
100 Billion Energy Incentives
Response to Clayton Jones
·So start imagining solution with out crushing the common man¨ What a profound statement, Mr Jones appears to have found a very simple solution to our energy needs. This may also be a very relitive solution to correcting our current economic problem. 100 Billion is a lot of dough. The problem I see with this INCENTIVE, is the fact that it is an incentive and not a grant. There are many Clayton Jones out there with great solutions to fix the problems and many common men that have possable solutions to add to a fix. Make the 100 Billion available to all and the solution shall be fixed. Science research alone can suck up a 100 Billion in a very short time, Producing What, another Nobel Prize Winner.
Energy and Environment
Whether you like it or not the simple fact is that we are terraforming our planet. But without a design or a plan.
advertisement





