Can President-elect Barack Obama Deliver on His Campaign Promises?


In the end, Obama won all the states carried by Democratic nominee John Kerry in 2004 and added eight states carried by Republican George Bush that year, including Florida, Ohio, Indiana, Virginia, North Carolina, and New Mexico.
Exit polls showed some remarkable shifts in the electorate. Race, long a source of deep divisions and bitterness, was considered a wild card, with some pollsters wondering if a significant number of white voters would reject Obama simply because he is African-American. But 9 out of 10 voters said race wasn't an important factor for them.
About 62 percent of voters said the economy was their biggest concern—far and away the most important issue. About 19 percent listed Iraq or terrorism, and 9 percent said healthcare. Only 35 percent approved of the Iraq war, which McCain had pledged to win and Obama promised to end as quickly and responsibly as possible, giving Obama an advantage. More than 8 out of 10 Americans believed the country was headed in the wrong direction, and 7 out of 10 disapproved of President Bush's job performance—a fact that deeply hurt McCain's Republican candidacy because of guilt by association.
Now that he is moving toward governing rather than getting elected, Obama might be wise to follow Roosevelt's example in more areas than confidence building. "You've got to be flexible," Dallek says. "The realities you are dealing with are always changing." He adds, "you need to go about it in a very practical, pragmatic way. It's like a quarterback. You try one play and, if it doesn't work, you try again. The New Deal was a series of experiments." Adds Al From, chief executive of the centrist Democratic Leadership Council: "Obama's most important thing is to keep what is essentially his big promise—the promise that allowed him to catapult over Hillary Clinton and win the nomination and the general election—that he would bring change and a postpartisan politics." To that end, From says, Obama should name Republicans to key cabinet positions, perhaps by keeping Robert Gates as defense secretary, at least for a while, or installing GOP Sen. Dick Lugar of Indiana, a foreign policy specialist, as secretary of state. "That would send a message that he is serious about a new kind of politics," From says. Notes Mike McCurry, former White House press secretary for Bill Clinton: "There is absolutely no trust up there [on Capitol Hill]. The first thing they need is trust."
Obama's first public move, however, was to offer the job of White House chief of staff to Rep. Rahm Emanuel of Chicago, chairman of the House Democratic Caucus, a fierce partisan and former senior official in the Clinton White House. This suggested that Obama realized that he needs some experienced hands at his side. The Emanuel pick also showed that he wants the advice of a tough-minded insider who has no qualms about confronting his adversaries, so Obama can take the kinder, gentler approach.
On October 31, Obama told CNN that he would set five immediate priorities: "stabilize" the financial system, move toward energy independence, enact some form of healthcare reform, grant middle-class tax cuts, and strengthen the education system. But he made clear that the nation has entered an era of limits because the economy is in such bad shape.
Obama plans to meet with members of Congress before his inauguration to let them know that everyone will have to scale back their expectations from government, including requests for earmarks or special projects. He told CNN he would explain to the legislators that, "Right now, we can only do those things that are absolutely necessary." If the legislators balk, Obama advisers say he will use his network of millions of supporters and donors around the country to create support for his agenda through phone calls, letters, and E-mails—much as Ronald Reagan (using different means) did with his conservative network in the 1980s.
Reader Comments
NOT CERTAINLY
i HAVE SEEN his right palm in a photo so and also with regrad to astrology
i can say his period to october 2009 would be crucial for USA
i mean to say usa would not get back normal till november 2009
also India because we go hand in hand .
but some good news would be oin march 2009 venus would rescue .
this was my astrology part now my political approach ,
USA would be again target of terrorism and if USA enters a war
it would go long but if it takes help of india a good help india have never attacked any country from last 10000 years sice lord rama attacked sri lanks to free her wife .and later killed lankan ruler .
so is blessed to india if india would attack any country always it would win .
when we had a war with pakistan we had cleared half pakisan in just 24 hours
and in bangladesh 3 days even when then USA had sent troops against india but india won .
Promises , i think Obama would get good fame if he controls first year 2009 well.
going in war always is not good .
Also china is eating up europe and american economies .In my country india i can say is recession but we are misers , notme i am poor ,so we save so much money that even from 300 years it is stocking which we never show to government .
so in india nevrer can any economy recession an do much harm we have saving habit
we wear torn clothes even when we are billionaires
not me ha haha but coommmon ly
ok a tip for USA - friendly talks and visits of us president to countries woudld help usa get rid of CHINA
USA should give opportunity to south america not china .
is world known CHINA is number one USA is a toy in front of china
be it economic aggression or be it WMDs..........
Bush Has Much Better Environmental Record Than Clinton
Bush Has Much Better Environmental Record Than Clinton.
By: Jordan C. Fan, Prophet Of Environment.
I must add that Bush Has Much Better Environmental Record Than Clinton. In fact, Bush record could even be 100 time better Clinton while Gore claims to be an Environmental candidate. For the Environment, God, Devil or Heaven, the current election was a very convenient way of sorting out bad elements in the American society that whoever voted for any Democrat will be punished harishly by God. It is, kind of, similar to the "Last Judgement." As far as God is concerned, He certainly knew what everyone were doing inside the voting booths.
advertisement









