McCain and Obama: The Pluses and Minuses
Looking at the leadership style of the next president
Despite its diversions and distractions, the presidential campaign has provided some important insights into the character and leadership potential of the two main contenders—just as it's supposed to do.
What have we learned about them?
Republican nominee John McCain has shown himself to be impulsive, aggressive, and combative. He always seems to be looking for the bold surprise that will enable him to conquer the enemy and ensure "victory," as he wants to do in Iraq and Afghanistan. This is what he was trained to do as a Vietnam-era naval aviator, and it reflects his gambler's instincts as someone who enjoys a high-rolling game of craps now and then. Summing up his leadership philosophy, McCain recently told ABC's This Week: "I'm a Teddy Roosevelt Republican. I've got to get in the arena when America needs it.... Whether I helped or hurt, I'll be glad to accept the judgment of history."
McCain's campaign has been marked by examples of what a loyalist calls "leading from the gut," as President Bush has done for eight years. His campaign "suspension" a few weeks ago—announced as the way to help break a stalemate over the multibillion-dollar financial "rescue package" in Congress—got him dramatic headlines although it had little impact on the talks.
Palin factor. McCain's pick of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his vice presidential running mate was another example of his preference for the dramatic. As his position slipped in the polls, McCain sought a game-changer. He selected Palin as the first woman on a Republican ticket, ignoring Palin's minimal understanding of national and international issues, which is now eroding her initial popularity with key swing voters. More broadly, McCain sought an advantage by reversing his long-standing support for deregulation as he voted for the huge financial bailout, and he changed his mind and supported offshore drilling to reduce U.S. dependence on foreign oil.
These are either examples of common-sense flexibility or crass opportunism, but in each case they show McCain's willingness to do something unexpected to shake things up. "Senator McCain is zigging and zagging and attacking and trying to figure out what his next tactical step is," says a prominent Republican who has advised two past GOP presidents. "But it's very difficult for McCain to separate himself as a Republican from the last eight years of Republican rule."
He tried, though, during his third and final debate with Barack Obama on October 15 when he responded to his adversary's efforts to tie him to the unpopular incumbent. "Senator Obama," McCain said derisively, "I am not President Bush. If you wanted to run against President Bush, you should have run four years ago." But, true to form, McCain came across as a bit too abrasive, and instant polls found that most debate watchers thought Obama won the night.
Obama, on the other hand, has remained steady and unflappable, both during McCain's repeated debate attacks and, earlier, during the Democratic primaries when he was losing to Hillary Clinton. Obama has shown he is a quick study and is a better campaigner now than he used to be, more nimble, more reassuring, more focused on the middle class, which is where the election will be decided. Many find him likable and engaging, ever ready with an incandescent smile and inspirational rhetoric.
- 1
- 2
- Next Page >
Reader Comments
LOLOLOLOL
John Mc Cain and Sarah Palin are members of a wicked gang of neocons who have damaged the economy of this country and started unnecessary wars that cost us billions of US$ and thousands of the lives of our young and brave soldiers. They have lied to all Americans about WMD in Iraq and unfortunately got us stuck in a quaqmire with no way out in the near future.Nobody can trust or tolerate such wicked clowns for another presidential term under any circustances. The proper place for John Mc Cain is a suitable oldman house, not the White House nor even the Senate.
elections
In response (to Vis of AZ) He said "I am surprised that EVERYONE on the democratic side is GOING CRAZY against anyone with a different opinion...."....HELLO do you see anything wrong with that sentence ????? It is not ALL on either side just the extremeist (in anything) that are the problem.
advertisement









