10 Things You Didn't Know About Tom Ridge
1. Thomas Joseph Ridge was born on Aug. 26, 1945, in Munhall, Pa. The son of a meat salesman who also sold shoes on the weekend, Ridge grew up in a veterans' housing project in Erie, Pa.
2. Ridge was president of his high school class and played the lead in the school production of Arsenic and Old Lace. He attended Harvard University on an academic scholarship and graduated with a degree in government in 1967. During his years at Harvard, he returned to Erie each summer to work in construction. He received his J.D. from Dickinson School of Law in 1972.
3. In 1968, Ridge was drafted into the Army. He served in Vietnam as a noncommissioned officer and was awarded the Bronze Star. His service in Vietnam was curtailed when his appendix ruptured.
4. Hearing-impaired from birth, Ridge had the condition worsen as a result of his military service. He wears a hearing aid. Ridge serves as chairman of the National Organization on Disability.
5. He married librarian Michele Moore in 1979. They have two children, Lesley and Tommy.
6. In 1980, Ridge was a Republican campaign organizer in Erie for George H. W. Bush's failed presidential bid. The Bush family supported Ridge's successful 1982 candidacy for a House seat in a traditionally Democratic Pennsylvania district--he won the election by only 729 votes. He was the first enlisted Vietnam combat veteran to be elected to the House of Representatives.
7. Ridge served six terms in the House before being elected governor of Pennsylvania in 1994.
8. CNN anchor Lou Dobbs was a Harvard classmate and they often stayed up late playing Monopoly.
9. After the September 11 attacks, President George W. Bush asked Ridge to become the first Office of Homeland Security adviser, overseeing the creation of what would become the Department of Homeland Security. During his tenure at DHS, the color-coded terrorism alerts system was launched.
10. Since leaving government service, Ridge has served on several corporate boards, including those of Home Depot, Exelon Corp., and Hershey.
Sources:
Biography Resource Center Online
New York Times
Washington Post
Chicago Tribune
St. Petersburg Times
Baltimore Sun
Financial Times
Almanac of American Politics
Reader Comments
Something else to know about Tom Ridge
The long-standing love affair which a majority of Pennsylvanians have had with former Governor Tom Ridge is likely to come to a screeching halt for many of them in the next couple years
That’s when one of Ridge’s lurking gubernatorial legacies, a ticking time bomb, emerges after two decades from the shadows. A product of the law of unintended consequences, it’s the impending reversal of the deregulation of electrical rates throughout the commonwealth which Ridge sponsored and championed as governor in the mid-1990s.
The return to unregulated electricity rates will complete the triple whammy of energy consumer cost explosions and exacerbate the adverse economic impact which has followed the dramatic increases in gasoline and heating fuels over the past year.
Depending upon location within the state, electric rates are expected to jump anywhere from 12 percent to 72 percent in 2010 and 2011, with a statewide average of more than 40 percent.
That’s when the rate caps imposed by the Electricity Generation Customer Choice and Competition Act - signed into law by Ridge in 1996 after a robust campaign promoting it - will expire.
The catalyst for the concerns about a forthcoming crisis in the skyrocketing consumer cost of electricity is a study recently released by the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC).
It found that if the rate caps were to come off today, electric rates in Pennsylvania would rise overnight by an average of 43 percent, and impose a calamitous burden on home, commercial and industry users. The spike in electric prices is expected to be highest in the western part of the state, where they look to rise by as much as 67 percent in Allegheny County, and 50 percent in northwestern Pa., according to the PUC study.
Some experts believe impending deregulation will precipitate a mass exodus of industry and commerce from Pennsylvania, cause thousands of small businesses throughout the commonwealth to fail, result in massive unemployment, and further impoverish low income residents, all which the 1996 deregulation act was designed, over-optimistically as it turns out, to forestall.
After the fall, the act will allow electricity producers to charge rates based upon their costs of production and delivery. Previously, they could not recover those costs through proportional rate increases because of the ceiling placed on rates by the 1996 act, signed by Ridge after a robust campaign hailing and promoting it.
But with the caps due to come off at staggered intervals throughout the state in 2010 and 2011, electricity producers will be able to charge rates which putatively reflect their costs of acquiring the fuels needed to generate electricity – primarily oil, natural gas and coal. Those costs have risen exponentially since the electric rate caps were first applied in 1997.
Normally, the powerful electricity-producing lobby would have been able to thwart passage of legislation in 1996 regulating and putting caps on electrical rates. But what gave deregulation its impetus in the mid-90s was a disarming Faustian bargain between the popular Ridge administration and the general assembly on one hand, and the electric industry on the other, the unintended consequences of which are only now beginning to appear.
It provided that in exchange for acquiescing to rate caps, the industry would be allowed by the state through the PUC to pass on and recover from consumers the costs of constructing new electrical generating plants, a practice previously disallowed.
Ridge’s rationale centered on the theory that lower electrical rates than those in other states would attract new industry to Pennsylvania, produce tens of thousand of new jobs, and give rank and file Pennsylvania users more affordable electricity.
In the first years following deregulation, Pennsylvania surpassed other states in electrical rate-lowering, ranking first in the nation. In a February 7, 2001 press release Ridge said: “Once again we were named the No. 1 state for electric deregulation. Why? We have plenty of juice…we’re plugged in. Customers have greater choices. And consumers and businesses have saved $3 billion. So if any companies in California are listening,” Ridge gloated, “come on over to Pennsylvania. We’ll leave the lights on for you.” Ridge said at the time deregulation “will create more than 36,000 new jobs in Pennsylvania by 2004.” That never happened.
Ridge’s theory was based on the optimistic premise that the capped rates would bring new electric-producing competitors into the state and lower rates overall through wider competition. The flaw in the theory was that it self-destructed.
Newcomers couldn’t compete in Pennsylvania with the big existing producers. Even with the rate caps, existing producers were able to generate healthy profits since deregulation went into effect 20 years ago because of the absence of new competition.
With the unshackling of the rate caps two years hence, they will make a killing of unprecedented proportions at the expense of consumers unless the legislature and the PUC enact and devise remedies to interdict them against what is expected to be a powerful lobbying effort by the industry to make sure the rate caps disappear forever.
How is retribution exacted from a former governor whose failed vision 20 years after the fact results in punitive consequences on an unprecedented scale for his onetime constituents? By elevating him, apparently, to one of the nation’s leading cabinet level positions and, possibly, to the second-highest office in the land.
advertisement
