Clinton and Obama Lock in Iraq Positions During Debate
During the debate in Pennsylvania, both Democrats left little room for changing their minds on Iraq
Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama locked themselves into rigid positions on Iraq during a debate in Philadelphia Wednesday night.

Both said they would begin withdrawals of U.S. troops soon after taking office and would move quickly to end the war. They didn't leave themselves much room to change their minds even if the military situation were altered or U.S. commanders gave a different recommendation. This could make it more difficult for each of them to be flexible during the general-election campaign and, more important, as commander in chief.
"Only through our commitment to withdraw will the Iraqis begin to do what they have failed to do all of these years," Clinton said. "We don't know what will happen if we withdraw. We know what won't happen if we don't."
Obama said, "The president sets the mission. The generals and our troops carry out that mission."
These antiwar positions are popular in the Democratic Party, but they are sure to be used against the party's presidential nominee by GOP candidate John McCain and the Republican National Committee in the fall campaign. McCain says the Democrats favor retreat. He argues that the Iraq war is finally being won, and the United States must stay until victory is assured or the region will descend into chaos.
Overall, Obama seemed extremely cautious, even tentative, at times during the debate, sponsored by ABC News. Clinton seemed more in command and confident and repeatedly criticized her Democratic opponent on a variety of issues. The key Pennsylvania primary is next Tuesday, and Clinton clings to a modest lead. But Obama is ahead among delegates to the national convention, 1,643 to 1,504, according to the Associated Press, with 2,025 needed for the nomination. Ten contests remain.
Clinton may have caused herself the most severe problems Wednesday night when she said that Obama could definitely be elected president, in contrast to what she and her aides have been saying privately in raising questions with party leaders about his electability. Asked if Obama could win the White House, she replied, "Yes, yes, yes." Obama, when asked the same question about Clinton, replied, "Absolutely, and I've said so before."
But many voters appear to be unhappy with Clinton's attacks on Obama and her false claim that she faced sniper fire on a visit to Bosnia while she was first lady. These developments have apparently hurt her more than Obama's stumbles over describing small-town voters as bitter and his links to the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, his controversial former pastor in Chicago. Clinton again raised those two issues in the debate, while Obama generally stayed away from attacking her.
The latest ABC News/Washington Post poll finds only 39 percent of Americans believe Clinton is honest and trustworthy, while 62 percent have such positive feelings about Obama. The poll also found that 51 percent of likely Democratic voters nationally favor Obama and only 41 percent favor Cinton, his biggest advantage up to date.
Reader Comments
Rashid Khalidi
The Rashid Khalidi article published April 10th in the L.A. Times may have stoked Hillary Clinton to mention Senator Obama's associations, such as Rezko, Ayres, etc. without mentioning Mr. Khalidi. My point is it is entirely possible that a Clinton operative presented the going away celebration of Khalidi tape. In other words should a public outcry develop that forces the L.A. Times to publish the tape or a transcript, we could find out that the Clinton's fingerprints are all over this! It is equally tantalizing that perhaps the reason the Clinton's are working so hard for Obama is because Obama knows it was a Clinton associate that handed the L.A. Times the tape! While Obama could lose the election, the Clinton's would lose everything. Better an Obama as president, than Obama as holder of the Clinton cards. Just a thought.
Good Luck BO!
You'll need it if you're the nominee!
Obama and the Country of Doom
Obama spells doom for this country. Not only because of his dubious affiliations with mob members like Rezko and criminals like Auchi, but because of his lack of experience and bias education especially his bizarre religious affiliations. He is like silly putty; able to change his ideas for the public as needed so as to achieve his goal as supreme leader.
His intentions are unclear, but his affiliations are clear. Being surrounded with people like the violent Ayers, or the Hiteresque Wright, or his American hating wife Michelle, or his Kenyan half brother Islamic Jihad terrorist Abongo “Roy” Obama, or his Jewish/Israeli hating best friend Rashid Khalidi, or his close advisor Robert Malley who advocates supporting and helping the terrorist group Hamas, or Mr. McPeaks, Obama’s military advisor who open believes American Jews are the "problem." and “Christian Zionists were driving America's policy in Iraq to benefit Israel,” or Obama’s super delegate and major long term supporter Senator Meeks who openly hates and distrust all whites and gays or Obama’s most dangerous affiliation to Mr. Auchi who was Saddam Hussein right hand man and made billions in Iraq and has been a important supporter and behind the scene man throughout Obama’s rise to power.
And besides all this questionable laundry in Obama’s life, another serious question is why is Obama protected and promoted by the media? Is this also being directed from behind the scenes? The American public has been fooled before and I guess those in power know we can be fooled again. (Kennedy’s assassination, Martin Luther King’s assassination, the invasion of Iraq…).
The fact that Obama has made it this far demonstrates the collective lack of discriminative intelligence and education of this country. And nothing demonstrates this better than how well Obama plays his black card; which plays on our fear of being labeled a racist.
Add your thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.advertisement





