Obama's Years in Chicago Politics Shaped His Presidential Candidacy
Two decades in the Windy City produced the Obama we know today
CHICAGO—It started as a crossroads for traders, settlers, and soldiers on the blustery shores of Lake Michigan in the 1830s. Later, it became a prosperous railroad hub and a national center for manufacturing and commerce. It has been the scene of mayhem over the years, like the Great Fire of 1871, the Haymarket labor riot of 1886, and the violent protests at the Democratic National Convention of 1968. And in its brash and boisterous way, Chicago has produced all manner of distinctive leaders, celebrities, and rascals, ranging from liberal lawyer Clarence Darrow to gangster Al Capone, political boss Richard Daley, civil rights leader Jesse Jackson, Nation of Islam Minister Louis Farrakhan, talk-show host Oprah Winfrey, and basketball superstar Michael Jordan.
Now Barack Obama can be added to the list. And as Americans take the measure of the former community organizer on the South Side, few better insights are available into his character, views, and approach to politics than his two decades in Chicago. That's where he developed his commitment to accommodation and honed his ability to navigate smoothly among competing and often angry constituencies, all in a vast human stew of diversity.
"Politics in Chicago is an all-season sport, and it's not for the fainthearted," says U.S. Rep. Rahm Emanuel of the North Side, former White House political director for President Bill Clinton. Adds David Axelrod, a Chicago-based political consultant who is now chief strategist for Obama's presidential campaign: "Ours is a blunt, brawling way. People are upfront about their self-interest." The Chicago style of politics reminds Axelrod of the "invisible man" educational toy he knew as a youth—a human figure whose internal organs were fully exposed. "It's like Chicago—all laid bare," says Axelrod.
Extraordinary skills. In some ways, the narrative of Obama's political career has been oversimplified and distorted, partly because his Chicago background hasn't been sufficiently examined. He is neither an unblemished hero living under a star with only the purest of motives, as many of his supporters hope, nor a weak-minded naif who lacks the toughness to take on his harshest adversaries, as many of his detractors fear. Beyond the hype and the spin, Obama has operated as a conventional politician who has demonstrated some very unusual traits—extraordinary communication skills, the ability to grow as a leader, and the good sense and savvy to recognize a zeitgeist, the nation's powerful desire for change, when he sees one.
He has also exhibited intense personal ambition. In fact, local leaders and Obama friends say he couldn't have succeeded in Chicago without being an idealist, a pragmatist, and to some degree a self-promoter, all at the same time. "It's a great place to learn about politics and what motivates people," says Axelrod.
Unbridled ambition. Obama's Chicago background has enabled him to appeal to many divergent groups, from poor African-Americans to white businessmen, working-class folks, middle-class professionals, wheeler-dealers, mainstream reporters, teachers, suburban parents, professors, and college students. "I'm not surprised he has the skills to appeal to these different constituencies. That's what he learned in Chicago," says a Republican strategist with admiration. Jerry Kellman, who hired him as a community organizer 20 years ago, agrees. "I don't think he would have ended up where he is if he hadn't come to Chicago," says Kellman. "It's where he got an incredible education in real politics. His idealism became tempered with realism and practicality very quickly."
During his two decades of community and political involvement, he climbed the ladder of political success, with only one notable setback, often by adjusting his views and his methods to the needs of the moment. In the process, he learned to play hardball as practiced by local leaders and mentors such as former Mayors Harold Washington and Daley; activists such as Axelrod and Emanuel; religious leaders such as the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, his controversial former pastor; and local wheeler-dealers such as Tony Rezko, who raised money for his political career and helped him acquire property in a controversial land deal.
"Barack is a very egotistical guy with undeniable ambition," says a former adviser who has had a falling-out with him. "When he went national, he didn't care about anything else."
He had no personal connections to Chicago when, at 23 and living in New York after graduating from Columbia, he answered an ad in a trade publication for a community organizer in the Windy City. He was hired, and in June 1985 he moved there in his run-down blue Honda. The job paid a paltry $13,000 a year. He found himself in one of the most fascinating, complicated, and challenging urban environments in the country, a place where, as author David Mendell says, politics, race, and power are "inextricably intertwined."
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next Page >
Reader Comments
Obama moves DNC to Chicago
Here is a story that everyone should be aware of concerning Barack Obama and the DNC. If you value our democracy and do not want to have Chicago style politics take control of our government in Washington DC, you need to know the implications of the DNC being moved to Chicago this month.
Obama Moves DNC Headquarters to Chicago
from: NO QUARTER on June 13, 2008
I heard the news, and was struck by the audacity of Obama moving the DNC headquarters and employees to the epicenter of machine and mob politics. Ben Smith of Politico.com wrote that the abrupt move is “a major shakeup” and, in an understated phrase, a “departure from tradition.”
I knew at once that Barack Obama was seizing the DNC by the hair, and dragging it into his lair where he can seize control of the Democratic party’s monies, its employees, and any access to its power brokers. The party is no longer, in any way, the party of the Democratic voter. It is now Barack Obama’s party, to do with as he wishes.
The Obama-controlled Chicago machine will hold sway over all Superdelegates running for reelection this year — including their access to money, support, and endorsements.
Hatred has a two-way streak
It amazes me that people try and establish that a biracial man was influenced by hate speech. It would be similar to him talking about his mother. While I'm sure he has experienced the hatred associated with skin color, he remains above it all because he knows himself.
The people hyping the notion that Obama was so influenced being in that church for 20 years makes him racist , would take a moment and look in their own mirrors. Who shaped their opinions over a number of years, whether it was church, a social group, or a neighborhood; where did they get such a deep distrust from; if anyone has an excuse to hate it could be people of color who have been so shoddily treated by many of majority persuasion.
Yet, it is that same church paragigm/motiff that teaches the abused to pray for those who despitefully use you and love those that hate you. That is indeed somewhat of an oxymoron. Hatred is hatred and does not look good regardless of the source.
Hopefully, we can take this opportunity as people and realize that with the number of issues in our country as the present moment, hatred based on the color of one's skin is a petty exercise. We need to realize that we will never be able to move forward and work to resolve the issues of this era. With oil, food, disease, medicines, etc. it will take the best minds and efforts to alleviate these issues.
Who Will Be Sleeping In The Lincoln Bedroom, In January 09?
This is a question that has captured my attention lately. It has been brought to the forefront by simply paying attention to the bits and pieces which the forces that be have not been able to contain. Who Will Be Sleeping In The Lincoln Bedroom, In January 09? Wright? Rezko?
http://zachjonesishome.wordpress.com/who-will-be-sleeping-in-the-lincoln-bedroom-in-january-09/
Add your thoughts
All comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.advertisement

