Wednesday, February 10, 2010

America's Best Leaders

Breaking the Corporate Glass Ceilings

Posted November 20, 2009

With an African-American serving as the nation's chief executive, a woman heading the State Department, and a Latina settling into a new job on the Supreme Court, are there any glass ceilings left for minorities and women aspiring to leadership positions?

Plenty of them.

Though blacks, Hispanics, and American Indians represent roughly 30 percent of the population, they fill only 3 percent of senior management positions at American corporations and nonprofits, according to Management Leadership for Tomorrow, a minority recruitment and development group. Just 15 Fortune 500 companies are led by women. Even fewer have black CEOs. And while blacks and Hispanics generally constitute 5 to 10 percent of a big law firm's first-year associates, they account for around 2 percent of those firms' partners, according to David Thomas, a Harvard Business School professor who studies the issue. "People of color who start at the same time as an equivalent white person have less of a chance of being at the top echelon in 20 years," he says, "in whatever field you're talking about."

But more and more employers are working to change that. They're partnering with minority recruitment specialists who offer assistance with grooming minority professionals for leadership roles. Top business schools are following suit, putting more minorities on leadership tracks. And more private- and public-sector employers are adopting internal strategies for getting minorities into senior roles. The number of companies applying to be in DiversityInc. magazine's annual "Top 50 Companies for Diversity" rankings—for which minority representation in management is a key criterion—has more than tripled in four years, to over 400. "Most companies have realized that mathematically, they cannot have the best talent available if minorities aren't represented," says Luke Visconti, DiversityInc.'s CEO.

Which means that corporations working to narrow the minority leadership gap aren't acting out of some impulse toward social justice; they're trying to improve their bottom line. But maintaining diverse workforces has proved a challenge. A recent report by the recruiting firm Korn/Ferry International found that U.S. companies are wasting $64 billion annually by losing and replacing employees who leave their jobs "solely due to failed diversity management."

A shortage of minority leaders is a big part of the problem. Minority employees don't want to stick with companies where the top jobs appear to be off limits to them. "If blacks and Latinos and women are looking up the food chain and they don't see people who look like them at the top, why would they stay?" asks Visconti.

For PepsiCo, a longtime leader in minority recruiting, the naming of Indra Nooyi—an Indian-born woman—as CEO in 2006 has helped attract more minority talent. "It says to a [minority] person who is considering us as an employer that we are serious about diversity and inclusion," says Paul Marchand, the company's vice president of talent acquisition management and global human resources. "This can happen to them."

Slow going. PepsiCo's "diversity and inclusion" program also helps prepare minorities in middle management for senior management posts, contributing to a 12 percent jump in minorities and women in executive positions since 2001.

Even for employers striving to fill more top jobs with minorities, however, the process is almost always slow. Experts who've studied the minority leadership gap say it's due less to overt racism than to unconscious employer biases and entrenched networks and habits. "The undermining often starts very early in a career," says Harvard's Thomas, "when minorities are less likely to be invested in by mentors and bosses making subjective choices about which people have long-term prospects to run the firm."

The Korn/Ferry report found that 34 percent of those who've left jobs because of diversity-related issues said they probably would have stayed if managers had recognized their abilities.

Biases about who's qualified for the top jobs can also keep midcareer minorities and women from being plucked for those posts. With few minorities in upper management, it can be difficult for employers to picture them there. "We see it as more a sticky floor than a glass ceiling," says Kerri Gwinn Harris, who runs a St. Louis-based consulting firm that offers diversity training. "Minorities can get only so far in their career before getting stuck in middle management."

Reader Comments

Sorry Assume,light safety end roll institution leave board circle balance history package promise study offer test require conservative we news her dark round park medical observe driver relatively satisfy breath start position quick around exist full piece old total estate under good beat care process council device award quiet occur score refer mental sir measure thank with plan from trust advance more why contribute scientific product respond upon read reduce start pupil sufficient thing boat down unlikely grow including northern formal relative plant fully hang notion process another organization road right

No Surprise, Ann G.

It's ignorant women like you who never make it to the top. You're obviously not qualified for an executive position. And you don't deserve one.

Minorities . . .

First Ann G of IL, to have your comments taken as serious and credible you first need to learn to write. Your tirade amounts to nothing more than a Salem witch-hunt.

Your contention that all white males in corporate positions are idiots is an absolute preposterous conclusion. You fail to realize that practically everything we have today is the result of white males in high positions, whether it be in organizations, inventions, government, health care, etc. To say they failed, is to say that every organization in America is broken, which it's not.

I will contend that the reason there are not more minority executives of corporations is that the proverbial "cream" has not risen to the top in terms of minorities. I will also contend that, as a whole, white males have thus far a proven track record in terms of their historic ability to not just tackle those challenges, but to succeed.

I also contend that private industry (sole proprietor/llc) can hire who they want to hire. Why? Because it is not our business. If their choice has reprecussions in terms of decreased sales, limited distribution, and supply channel issues, then it's their perogative and choice.

I will conceed that women and minorities ought to be given a chance to hold executive positions. However, the means to achieve that end are rather limited and elusive.

Who is going to make that moral choice? Some say government. However, understand government's role is not to legislate morality (despite what the uninformed my think).

We all hope hard work, talent, education, and sacrifice get's the best man/woman hired. But, who do you hire as leaders within an organization when two or more candidates carry equal/similar creditials and qualifications? The question is best defined when considering the demographic of those they will lead/manage. For example, it would be an unreasonable stress to an organization to expect a black woman to truely lead and inspire an organization comprized of mostly white men? She would have to be infinitely more and better credentialed then any white male applicant. Unless, of course, success is unimportant like say, government, for example. It's not unreasonable to assume that their are some black women in American who do possess that type of rare talent and ability. But to put a token black woman as a figure head is not fair to her or the organization.

However, I propose that if we want to see barriers broken for minorities, then minorities have to step-up and show that they are head and shoulders above everyone OR they build their own organizations. Citing the government as a model of racial preference/favoritism is a failed example because government is filled with passive aggressive employees who tacitly follow and where success is not a priority. Shall we commit an injustice with the view to curing an injustice?

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

advertisement

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Today

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Methodology

Choosing America's Best Leaders 2009

America's Best Leaders is a collaboration between U.S.News & World Report and the Center for Public Leadership at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government.

COMMENTARY: David Gergen

The National Deficit—of Leadership

President Obama fired the imagination of the country during his campaign, but the glow has faded.

COMMENTARY: MICHELLE OBAMA

Michelle Obama

The Future Lies in Teachers

Having good teachers in classrooms is critical because education is the road to opportunity, the first lady writes.

advertisement

Sponsored Poll

What factor do you think is responsible for the majority of teen-driving crashes?

View Results

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.