How Technology Is Changing the Medical Profession
Clinical practice guidelines, electronic medical records, and population science are revolutionary
Over the ages, medicine has drawn to its ranks the best and the brightest, attracted by a career that brings together scientific knowledge, rigorously developed skills, and good judgment to help those in need. Whether it's breaking an asthma attack, delivering beautiful babies (even eight at a time), transplanting a heart, or comforting a dying patient, serving the sick—each of them a unique person—fills the minds of prospective doctors more than the daily onslaught of stories describing a medical system in crisis.
How could it be that the physician who touches the patient and sees how medical marvels create healthier lives seems so at odds with the public perception that the medical system is broken? The answer is that both are right. Grand success in patient care has increased the economic burden on society, which in turn has brought medicine's benefits under scrutiny. As we look ahead, physician decision-making and the biomedical research that makes medical care better will be reconciled with cost-effectiveness. And three innovations based on information technology—clinical practice guidelines, electronic medical records, and large-scale population science—will bring medicine into a new biological revolution.
Population science—or epidemiology and biostatistics—studies health and diseases in groups, not indiv-iduals. Once the domain of public-health officials tracking outbreaks in faraway places, epidemiology can now evaluate the frequency, morbidity, and mortality of virtually all health conditions and can assess the quality of the health system itself. The doctor who touches the individual sees success when an obese patient responds to a new bariatric intervention. But from the population perspective, obesity is a growing epidemic, fueling diabetes and heart disease and aided by social determinants like fast food. In this view, obesity is a failure of American medicine.
This disconnect between public health and personal health is changing as epidemiology and biostatistics offer a kind of macroscope that complements the microscope and stethoscope in assessing environmental and biological factors that underlie individual diseases. And epidemiological principles guiding controlled clinical studies have become the gold standard for evaluating medical interventions.
Evidence-based guidelines are a boon to practicing physicians and promote more uniform and higher quality care. At the same time, those who touch the patient directly must use them wisely: as guidelines, not as dictates that supplant critical thinking or oversimplify more complex and mysterious illnesses. Many a doctor has been humbled by charting therapy based on statistics that lead him or her to say, mistakenly, "This man has three months to live," or "This child will never walk."
On the record. Another innovation that will benefit patient care is the integrated electronic medical record, which will make information more available, more accessible, and more accurate. A powerful side benefit will accrue to population research itself because computerized information on virtually every American can be compiled, searched, shared, and analyzed. The government assures the public of medical privacy, but it will be the responsibility of the physician to see this is honored, for it is physicians, not the government, who have taken an oath to protect the secrets of their patients.
The national medical record will surely improve continuity and weed out redundancy of care. Integrating electronic medical records with reimbursement data will make immediately transparent the economic implications of the doctor's pen. This information should help physicians rein in inappropriate costs. It will also make it imperative for them to weigh in when arbitrary reimbursements inappropriately deny their patients care.
Information technology is ushering in sweeping changes that should make medicine better and safer. It will be the obligation of the physician to make sure that it remains high touch as well as high tech. That can only enhance the joy of being—and wanting to be—a doctor.
Reader Comments
TECHNOLOGY
THIS IS SOME VERY GOOD INFORMATION :] >>LOL!
Med Tech and research
There exists an imbalance in health care, whereby procedure based specialists receive better compensation than cognitive primary care preventive physicians. This has to change. Technology developed by scientists and engineers is the driving force of better medical care through improved and earlier diagnostics, better pharmaceutical drug production by high through put screening, and evolving robotically controlled surgery and nanomedicine. Doctors no longer "own " health care, but are just the visible end users of the technology and applied science products developed by others. To remain relevant, practising physicians must become more actively engaged in biomedical primary preventive and curative research, This way , a larger section of the physician population beyond those in academics will become generators and not just consumers of information.
Techno-medicine
Medicine is an art and science. It is so heart warming to read the article by an expert Physician, humanist and Prof.Bernadine Healy. What a joy to read her article, the intellectual and human dimensions of her thinking and down-to earth comments. I learnt a lot from writings. I teach in a medical school and it is wonderful to think that computer touch screen and finger touch do play a role in medicine. One cannot outweigh the other. It is true technology has brought diagnosis and thereapeutics to the forefront. In a time when primary care is a greater challenge in under-developed and developing countries technology may benefit tertiary care. Yet lack of basic medical facilities in many countries, even the basic required drugs that combat tuberculosis, parasitic infections haunt the world- we have a population centripetally located in high-tech care with the periphery rounded by millions asking for you to provide them with basic medicare. Only madam you could mobilize forces to see that such services reach any desperately wanting human to have without borders and prejudice. That is global health care.
advertisement








