Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Best Graduate Schools

Science Rankings Methodology

How we rank graduate programs in the sciences

Posted April 22, 2009

Rankings of doctoral programs in the sciences are based on the results of surveys sent to academics in computer science, mathematics, and physics during the fall of 2007, in biological sciences and chemistry during fall 2006, and in other fields during fall 2005. The individuals rated the quality of the program at each institution from "marginal" (1) to "outstanding" (5). Individuals who were unfamiliar with a particular school's programs were asked to select "don't know." The schools with the highest average scores among those who rated them were sorted in descending order and appear here. Surveys in biological sciences, chemistry, computer science, Earth sciences, mathematics, and physics were conducted by Synovate.

The universe of schools surveyed in computer science, mathematics, and physics consisted of schools that awarded at least five doctoral degrees, according to the National Science Foundation report "Science and Engineering Doctorate Awards," for the years from 2001 through 2006; in biological sciences and chemistry for the years from 2000 through 2005; and for Earth sciences from 1999 through 2004. In biological sciences, graduate programs may be offered in a university's medical school or its college of arts and sciences. If so, the programs were ranked separately.

Questionnaires were sent to the department heads and directors of graduate studies at each program in each discipline. Response rates were: for biological sciences, 21 percent of those surveyed responded; for chemistry, 32 percent; for computer science, 48 percent; for Earth sciences, 40 percent; for mathematics, 33 percent; and for physics, 32 percent.

Specialty rankings are based solely on nominations by department heads and directors of graduate studies at peer schools from the list of schools surveyed.

Reader Comments

Power of peer ratings

Because these scores come from experts in the field, they tell you a couple things about each institution: 1. reputation of faculty, 2. groundbreaking research, 3. research facilities, 4. funding--probably in that order. Whenever something groundbreaking gets published in those big scientific journals, people notice where the article came from.

Why?

What about these institutions specifically made them best?

N/A?

What does a ranking of N/A mean?

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

advertisement

Video

Grad School Trends in 2010

Find out why 2010 will be a bustling year for grad schools and see what's new in America's Best Graduate Schools.

From Simpletuition

FIND STUDENT LOANS

$

U.S. News & World Report student loan comparison by:

Advertisement

advertisement

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.