Library and Information Studies Rankings Methodology
How we rank library and information studies programs
U.S. News ranked 50 master's degree programs in the United States that are accredited by the American Library Association. The rankings are based solely on the results of a fall 2008 survey sent to the dean of each program, the program director, and a senior faculty member in each program. The questionnaires asked individuals to rate the academic quality of programs at each institution as outstanding (5), strong (4), good (3), adequate (2), or marginal (1). Individuals who were unfamiliar with a particular school's programs were asked to select "don't know." Scores for each school were totaled and divided by the number of respondents who rated that school. The response rate was 56 percent.
Specialty rankings: These ratings are based solely on the nominations of program deans, program directors, and a senior faculty member at each program. They were asked to chose up to 10 programs noted for excellence in each specialty area. Those with the most votes are listed.
Reader Comments
Rankings
It sounds like the people in the programs are asked to rate ALL the programs, not just their own. That probably balances out the people who give their own programs top marks. But it's not very clear.
Ranking Your Own Institutions
So, let me get this right: the folks who completed the survey worked for the school they ranked? You would have to really dislike your institution to give it bad marks.
Flawed
U.S. News and World Report's rankings ARE flawed. I wish there was something similar to the book, "Colleges That Change Lives," or www.ctcl.org, for Library and IS programs.
advertisement



