Friday, November 27, 2009

Best Colleges

How We Calculate the College Rankings

Posted August 19, 2009

Schools are unranked and listed separately for America's Best Colleges 2010 if they have indicated that they don't use the SAT or ACT test scores in admissions decisions for first-time, first-year, degree-seeking applicants. In a few cases, they are unranked if their school didn't receive enough responses from other academics on the peer assessment survey to allow us to use their peer score as part of the overall ranking.

Other schools were unranked for the following reasons: a total enrollment of fewer than 200 students; a vast proportion of nontraditional students; no first-year students (these are sometimes called upper-division schools). We did not rank a few specialized schools in arts, business, or engineering.

Sources, sources ... Most of the data come from the colleges—and U.S. News takes pains to ensure their accuracy. This year, 91.2 percent of the 1,477 colleges and universities we surveyed returned their statistical information. We obtained missing data from sources such as the American Association of University Professors, the National Collegiate Athletic Association, the Council for Aid to Education, and the Department of Education's National Center for Education Statistics. Data that did not come from this year's survey are footnoted. Estimates, which are never published by U.S. News, may be used when schools fail to report particular data points. Missing data are reported as N/A in the ranking tables.

The indicators we use to capture academic quality fall into seven categories: assessment by administrators at peer institutions, retention of students, faculty resources, student selectivity, financial resources, alumni giving, and (for national universities and liberal arts colleges) "graduation rate performance," the difference between the proportion of students expected to graduate and the proportion who actually do. The indicators include input measures that reflect a school's student body, its faculty, and its financial resources, along with outcome measures that signal how well the institution does its job of educating students. Following are detailed descriptions of the indicators used to measure academic quality:

Peer assessment (weighting: 25 percent). The U.S. News ranking formula gives greatest weight to the opinions of those in a position to judge a school's undergraduate academic excellence. The peer assessment survey allows the top academics we consult—presidents, provosts, and deans of admissions—to account for intangibles such as faculty dedication to teaching. Each individual is asked to rate peer schools' academic programs on a 5-point scale from 1 (marginal) to 5 (distinguished). Those who don't know enough about a school to evaluate it fairly are asked to mark "don't know." The peer score used in the rankings is the average score of those who rated the school on the 5-point scale; don't knows are not counted as part of the average. In order to reduce the impact of strategic voting by respondents, before calculating the average score we eliminated the two highest and two lowest votes each school received. Synovate, an opinion-research firm based near Chicago, in spring 2009 collected the data; of the 4,273 people who were sent questionnaires, 48 percent responded. This is up slightly from last year's 46 percent response rate.

Retention (20 percent in national universities and liberal arts colleges and 25 percent in master's and baccalaureate colleges). The higher the proportion of freshmen who return to campus the following year and eventually graduate, the better a school is apt to be at offering the classes and services that students need to suc ceed. This measure has two components: six-year graduation rate (80 percent of the retention score) and freshman retention rate (20 percent). The graduation rate indicates the average proportion of a graduating class who earned a degree in six years or less; we consider freshman classes that started from 1999 through 2002. Freshman retention indicates the average proportion of freshmen who entered the school in the fall of 2004 through fall 2007 and returned the following fall.

Reader Comments

specific methodology criticized

To give a lot of credit (16% of the total) for a high graduation rate makes Harvard look "better" than Caltech, which is simply a HARDER school. Is easier better? NIMO.

To give significant credit (5%) for a high alumni-giving rate favors schools that put a lot of resources into soliciting alumni giving. I have degrees from three institutions. One solicits never (maybe they lost me); another solicits about four times a year; Harvard solicits about every two weeks. Maybe USNews should divide the alumni-giving rate by the number of solicitations per year!

Peer reviews 25%? Seems likely to provide "inertia" in the rankings. A school undergoing REAL improvements or REAL deterioration will not be perceived as such immediately.

Low acceptance rate and low student/faculty ratio seem like good indicators, but here again I note the Harvard vs Caltech comparison does not reflect reality. Caltech has twice the acceptance rate that Harvard does, yet most of those accepted at Harvard would have no chance in h*ll of getting into Caltech. OK, I'm being unfair: not everyone wants to be an engineer or scientist. A fairer comparison would be, how many students who applied to BOTH of these two schools got into just one of the two, and which school did they get into? And maybe even, which did they choose to attend?

Do not question the rankings

There is really no reason to question the methodology of the rankings. Whenever an outsider, for whatever reason, must judge a university, that outsider will, more often than not, refer to nothing other than the US News rankings, making those rankings the be all end all of a college education. It is really irrelevant how the rankings are formed; in fact, the rankings could be generated based solely on past years' rankings, or the average bank statements of students enrolled, while the students are required of nothing more than paying their tuition and receiving a degree in return. At the end of the day, it's nothing more than a status symbol. In the middle ages, there was land--in the 21st century, Harvard.

brand name..?

Guys gimme a clue on how much the name of the university helps us in getting an offer letter after master course completion...if we leave alone top league univ..lets say amongst univs

ranked more than 60..is it logical to say that name of the univ hardly matters.?

Im kinda stuck choosing the univ for my masters :s

Thanks.

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

advertisement

From Simpletuition

FIND STUDENT LOANS

$

U.S. News & World Report student loan comparison by:

advertisement

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.