Schools Crack Down on Boundary Hopping
Sending your child to a school outside the district where you live can lead to arrest or a $5,000 fine
The case of Yolanda Hill, a mother from Rochester, N.Y., who faces criminal charges that she lied about where she lived so that four of her children could attend schools in the suburbs, is renewing attention on a problem that plagues school districts nationwide. It's known as "boundary hopping." Parents will use a false address to enroll their children in schools they think are better or safer than those in their home district.
Officials with the Greece Central School District in New York say Hill used her mother's address in the district to register her kids there, even though they actually lived in Rochester. Hill's mother, Mary Marshall, says her daughter only wanted her kids to receive a good education and didn't know she was breaking the law. Now her daughter could go to prison. She has been charged with third-degree grand larceny and first-degree offering a false instrument for filing, both felonies. Her case goes to a grand jury in March. Hill's attorney could not be reached for comment for this article.
While student boundary hopping is not uncommon, it's rare for school districts to seek criminal charges against parents. Hill's case suggests that districts are getting fed up. From California to Connecticut, school boards are adopting tougher measures to stop "sneak-ins," who, they say, drain precious resources from the district's proper student body, especially now, when dollars are scarce. Many districts spend tens of thousands of dollars each year to purge these students from their enrollment lists. Their strategies include setting up anonymous tip lines, hiring private investigators who will stake out bus stops and follow students to their real homes, and blanketing the community with bulletins that warn about the consequences of submitting a fake address. In Broward County, Fla., for example, the school board agreed to put up posters this year that read, "False address can lead to arrest." Student registration forms now warn parents that lying about where they live can cost them their homestead tax exemption or even lead to a perjury charge and jail time.
For Broward and other top-performing school systems, a lot is at stake. Taxpaying residents of those districts say it's not fair to subsidize the education of a child whose parents don't pay taxes in the district. They worry about the impact on class sizes, test scores, and programs such as special education. Sometimes, this community outrage does prompt tougher enforcement of residency rules. In 2006 in Grosse Pointe, Mich., a wealthy suburb of Detroit, about 3,000 parents who signed a petition pressured the school board to spend $8,000 to reregister all 9,000 students in the district. At the end of its investigation, the district found only 40 nonresident students.
Jay Worona, general counsel to the New York State School Boards Association, says districts have a legal obligation to enforce residency requirements and investigate fraud, and it's also in their interest to make examples out of parents who break the law. "If a district was to gain a reputation of not being particularly vigilant, there might be an invitation to other parents [living outside the district] to go ahead and bring your child in," Worona says.
Authorities in Greece, a large suburb east of Rochester, arrested Hill, 33, on February 9. Greece public schools serve roughly 13,000 students and consistently post strong scores on state tests. In contrast, the Rochester City School District serves more than twice as many students, most of whom live below the federal poverty line, and has a poor record of performance, especially at the high school level. Kevin Degnan, a former law enforcement officer who now works for the Greece school district, conducted the investigation that led to Hill's arrest. He spent mornings and afternoons staking out bus stops and the house in Greece where Hill said she and her children lived. Degnan alleges that only the kids' grandmother lived at the house. According to Degnan, the children live with Hill in Rochester and commuted to Greece every morning, waiting at bus stops and then heading to their respective schools. District officials estimate the cost of educating Hill's four children since the beginning of the school year at $28,000. Degnan says the district had no choice but to seek charges against Hill, who he says was given several warnings. "I feel sorry for the children," Degnan says. "I don't feel sorry for the parents."
- 1
- 2
- Next Page >
Reader Comments
school hoping
It is so stupid to prosecute these people for living in a different school district...what about the kids? I doubt that it is always about just the school but the feelings of the kids....most parents dont like to keep changing there kids schools especially if the child has been there for years ...that is what is familiar to them ...their friends and school staff is what their use too...if you force them to change because some unexpected thing has happened with the parents like losing their job or something why should the kid have to pay or go through the trauma of also having to change schools? Why not just work out a way for the parent to pay the school district tax so the kids dont have to be punished by losing what they have always known. Its so unfair. Especially being a single mom (as i am) it is so hard to find a reliable and trustworthy way to get your kids to and from school and work a full time job. I had to lie before when my child was in elementary school because he had to be there at 9am and i had to be at work by 6:30am. I had no one to count on at the time but one of my closest friends and she and i lived in different districts all though both were good school districts.I didnt know anyone in my district and definitely dint know who to trust with my son so my friend was my only option i couldnt move to her area i couldnt afford it i was staying w/my parents at the time who aslo had to be at work before 7am. Where is the compassion for the struggling parents ....its all about money right...ugh it sucks.
parents teach children that it's okay to cheat and lie...
Public schools are designed to serve those in a SPECIFIC community, those who LIVE in that district! More often than not, areas with better schools have residents who pay higher taxes to support those schools. I choose to buy a smaller in one of these areas instead of a nicer, newer, bigger house somewhere else. I did this knowing that MY DISTRICT had good schools and also knowing that I would pay HIGHER taxes and that some of MY tax dollars would benefit my children's educational opportunities. THIS IS HOW I DECIDED TO SPEND MY MONEY! When kids come in from outside of my district, they are stealing from me and my family...how can you say this is okay? Life is all about decisions...both my wife and I drive older cars that we own. I do not own a plasma or flat screen TV at all. I sometimes shop at the Good Will, I work a 2nd part-time job, I take care of the things I own, I contribute to my 401K…I do all of these things because I accept that I am responsible for myself and do not/should not expect anyone else to take care of me so long as I am able bodied. Yes, we choose to spend money on higher tax rates, as do our neighbors, because that's what's important to us...if you can't afford the same, work harder and longer, find a 2nd job, or take my apologies and advantage of some type of government handout program as benefit enough for you and your family. But, please do not claim that you are entitle to anything that I have worked so hard for. Do not claim all of those who are district jumping are doing so as a last resort, or after lots of hard work has failed, because more often than not this is a lie...what's worse, these parents are teaching their kids that it's okay to lie and steal from someone else if you think it's for a good reason. Hmmm….I have a 9 year old car, I guess I should go steal a new car, right? It’s okay because I really want the best for my family…and besides it would come from some “rich” persons dealership, so it’s okay to steel from them…heck, everyone else has one...
this is unacceptable
The first comment is wrong, you do not know their situation, however inorder for her kids to get the decent education then i think its acceptable for her to put a wrong address. but if a serious situation happen then they couldnt report her house if she dont have a phone..this is just my opinion..
advertisement








