What Arne Duncan Thinks of No Child Left Behind
The new education secretary talks about the controversial law and financial aid forms
Newly minted Education Secretary Arne Duncan has big plans for improving the nation's schools. His first order of business is drumming up support for a stimulus measure that includes an unprecedented $140 billion for education. The 44-year-old former leader of Chicago Public Schools says the money will modernize schools, help stave off teacher layoffs, and spur meaningful reforms. "The fact is that we are not just in an economic crisis; we are in an educational crisis," he says. "We have to educate ourselves to a better economy."
The subsequent item on his agenda will be fixing the Bush Administration's No Child Left Behind law. His opinion of it: "I think we are lying to children and families when we tell children that they are meeting standards and, in fact, they are woefully unprepared to be successful in high school and have almost no chance of going to a good university and being successful."
But Duncan is also interested in other people's opinions. He's meeting with the heads of the two national teachers unions and, if and when the stimulus passes, he plans to travel the country to gather input from school officials and families about ways to improve the federal testing law. Duncan also says he is in the market for ideas to rename the law.
He discussed some of those plans in an interview with U.S. News. Below are highlights of that conversation.
On a federal stimulus for schools:
Duncan says a large chunk of the $140 billion destined for education will help states maintain and create jobs. "My concern is that hundreds of thousands of good teachers, not just bad teachers, are going to go, and that would be devastating," he says. "It is to no one's advantage if class size skyrockets or librarians get eliminated or school counselors disappear."
Duncan says the federal stimulus for schools would give him unprecedented leverage to innovate and improve schools. The stimulus provides for $15 billion in discretionary funds that he says he will give to states that agree to implement the following three pieces: expanding early childhood education, creating better student assessments, and improving teacher quality. "If we can bucket all these together and work with set of states with significant resources to make this happen, I think it's a game changer."
On fixing No Child Left Behind:
As the former leader of Chicago Public Schools, Duncan lived through what he called the unintended consequences of President Bush's No Child Left Behind law. Duncan supports the focus on accountability for student achievement, but he wants to make the law less punitive. "I know there are schools that are beating the odds where students are getting better every year, and they are labeled failures, and that can be discouraging and demoralizing," he says.
Duncan also wants states to adopt academic standards that are more rigorous and aligned with those of other leading nations. "The idea of 50 states doing their own thing doesn't make sense," Duncan says, referring to the current patchwork of standards and tests. "I worry about the pressure because of NCLB to dummy those standards down."
Duncan says he is concerned about overtesting but he thinks states could solve the problem by developing better tests. He also wants to help them develop better data management systems that help teachers track individual student progress. "If you have great assessments and real-time data for teachers and parents that say these are [the student's] strengths and weaknesses, that's a real healthy thing," he says."
Asked if he will push for passage of a new version of NCLB, Duncan says that he first wants to go on a cross-country listening tour and that he hopes that Congress will reauthorize a new version of the law late in the year. "Having lived with this, I have a good sense of what makes sense and what doesn't," he says. "But I want to be clear that I want to get out there and learn from people. And I think ultimately we should rebrand [the law]."
Asked what he would call a new version of the law, Duncan answered, "Don't know yet. I'm open to ideas."
On higher education:
Duncan did not offer too many concrete ideas on higher ed. He says community colleges will play a vital role for an extraordinary number of adults who need training for new jobs in the health, technology, and green sectors. That's why he wants to make sure that more students are prepared for college and leave college with a degree.
- 1
- 2
- Next Page >
Reader Comments
NCLB Violates 10th Amendment
I'm sorry but while the idea of standards for education are valid, NCLB violates the 10th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution which states, ""The powers not delegated to the United States by this constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states, respectively, or to the people"
Since education is not specifically cited in the Constitution, the conducting of this "power" falls under the umbrella of this amendment and is "... reserved to the states."
I also find it interesting that the re-authorization of this Act is now TWO years late yet public schools must continue to follow the guidelines of the original authorization. Sounds like a classic example of "If we (that is, politicians) ignore it, we won't have to deal with it." This reeks with more of the current transformation of the federal system of government into a national system.
Parents involved in their child's education
I am a director of a childcare center and has been in the field of ECE for 27 years. I have a daughter that teach high school students in Tennessee (4th year) and a daughter that is teaching in her 1st year at a middle school in Georgia. I have seen the changes in young children over the past 20 years and the dynamics of the parents. They are young and uneducated or the grandparents are raising the children. My daughter in Tennessee is getting frustrated in her 4th year as a public school teacher because she feels that the school system does not support the teachers but rather the parents who refuse to work with the teachers to help in their child's education. The parents seem to want the easy way out and that is just for their child to pass and get out of high school. My daughter's goal is to prepare her students for college but the "system" only seem concern with them "passing", even if it is a low average. Parents do not attend conferences but quick to come to the school to complain about the teacher. My daughter is working on her masters degree so that she can get out of the teaching profession and into counseling. She is a great teacher and I constantly encourage her to inspire her students but she tells me she does but then they go home to parents that do not give them any goals to reach. I don't want my other daughter to start feeling that way after a few years of teaching. I listened to Seceretary Duncan, Newt Gringrich, and Al Sharpton today on "Meet the Press" and heard them speak about parents role in their child's education. I agree that parents need to give their children a goal to reach towards and help them get there. As we educate the children, we need to educate the parents. They may need a new goal to reach and be inspired so that they can give it to their children. Let's not only invite parents to come to the school, let's mandate that they must attend and be involved in their child's education on a weekly basis. Yes parents have to work but they also have to be involved in their child's education. Yes I was there for my children and even more so for my son (behavior) as a single parent. I even had one of my son's teachers to tell me that he would not graduate just because he was turning 17 and they ususally drop out but I was determined that he would graduate and he did. Why, because I made him have a goal and I made him achieve it just like my daughters. In my own profession I see unwilling parents to work with their child's teacher in the preschool environment and I am working hard to start them (parents)on the right foundation to be involved in the school by speaking with them directly on being involved and mandated they speak with the teachers weekly and the teachers speak with the parents. It starts when they are young and hopefully the school system will see the need also.
Kevin Jennings
I am pleading with you to have Kevin Jennings, "Safe and Drug Free Schools" Czar, removed from this very important position. His past history is highly questionable in regard to working with children. His advice to a young boy seeking counsel after being molested by an older man is documented. Please, do not let this go; what if it were your child or grandchild that came to him for help? There are lots of good people who truly have the best interest of children at heart who could serve in this position. Stand up for those who cannot stand up for themselves.
Sharon Wood
Midland, MI
advertisement








