Transfer Students Feel the Pinch When Money Is Tight
State cuts to higher education are particularly tough for transfer students
Even for a school in the midst of a historic budget crisis, the University of Florida's decision to downsize this fall's transfer student class by 33 percent was stunning. The situation is bad news for wannabe Gators, but it also cast gloom over transfer programs in the 28 other states that face projected budget shortfalls—especially the 15 that already have proposed or enacted higher education cuts this year, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
Florida's public university system has seen $164.9 million in cuts the past two fiscal years, forcing it to reduce enrollment overall. "I've never really been through anything like this before," UF Provost Joe Glover says. On top of that, UF's dramatic transfer reduction was exacerbated by bad timing. Acceptance letters for regular students were within days of being sent when the admissions office was ordered to shrink the student body. Transfer students were forced to take the hit.
Florida is perhaps the most extreme example of transfer students' vulnerability, but others around the country could soon begin to see the flailing economy affect their own opportunities.
The trouble can begin during the clunky and overly complicated transfer admissions process. While students who come from community colleges are often assisted by long-standing agreements between a state's junior colleges and its flagship universities, the path for everyone else—those who are crossing state lines, who come from another four-year university, or who have spent years in the workforce—is far more treacherous. The process is difficult to navigate without the help of counselors and advisers, positions that often are left unfilled when budget cuts need to be made.
Transfer students are "a labor-intensive audience that can fall between the cracks because of personnel," says Jenny Sawyer, the University of Louisville's executive director of admissions. "The transfer process is more complex than the financial aid system." The problem, according to Sawyer, is even more worrisome at urban schools like Louisville, which tend to attract more students from the workforce and out of state.
David Moldoff, a higher education consultant, predicts state governments will soon start passing laws that force schools to streamline all in-state transfers, not just ones from nearby community colleges. These statewide articulation agreements, which are usually unfunded, are designed to show how much a state is committed to higher education access, even as the government slashes funding by double-digit percentages.
"They're not giving any more money, but they're passing a policy," Moldoff says, pointing to New Jersey, which passed such a law in the midst of a severe budget crisis last year. "It's a broad framework without drilling down to the details." The result, once again, benefits transfer students from within the state, leaving behind out-of-state students and those who last went to school well before the new requirements were enacted.
In the immediate future, transfer students will also likely be disproportionately affected by tuition increases and faculty reductions, tactics universities often use to trim costs. Transfer students tend to be poorer than traditional admittees, and with the price of tuition rising faster than the inflation rate, the competition between students for a share of the college's limited federal Pell grant money becomes increasingly important.
Course selection—or lack thereof—is particularly challenging for transfers. Unfilled faculty positions force universities to reduce the number of classes available, and transfer students are usually last to the dinner table, registering for classes after regular students. With fewer options, they are left with the scraps or no classes at all.
The news, however, is not all bad. Next year, the University of Florida will be able to more evenly distribute enrollment cuts, Glover says. Struggling universities continue to reassert their commitment to transfer students, some citing increasing numbers and enhanced recruitment efforts. Private schools, relatively unaffected by state budget woes, remain a strong option for transfer students. Though they tend to be more expensive, they also have better counseling services.
According to the Department of Education, almost 20 percent of those enrolled in four-year colleges are transfer students. The transfer ranks are increasing, but if the community college student's dream is to transition into that flagship state school, the plight of the state of Florida does not bode well. State economies continue to flounder, and as schools prepare for more tough times, many admit that the end of troubles—for both traditional and transfer students—is nowhere in sight.
Reader Comments
not just for the money
There's a point here I'd like to make. Obtaining a 4yr degree for many isn't just to get the best pay, if that is the case, then you are likely to be dissappionted, or find yourself going back to school, as most of my fellow parents, classmates, friends, and neighbors are. However, for those who have never been to college and always wanted the chance, but because of a variety of diffents reasons, including, low academic acheivements, low to no income, first generation college students, unplanned children, and or illnesses etc. Obtaining a 4year degree is a since of accomplishment at best. Whether the pay will equal the time and money it took to achieve it is irrelevent. My point is best illustrated in the movie, "homeless to Harvard." Many outside circumstances does not dictate the end result, some of our most profoundly intelligent americans will matricate from the most improvish dysfunsional families.....
forget a 4 year college
This goes to show how a 4 year degree is becoming obsolete and a burden. A recent article on msn stated that almost 60 percent of America's workforce, those with college degrees, are working in positions in which they are over qualified for. Many positions do not even require a college degree.
GO TO VOCATIONAL SCHOOL! There are many excellent vocational programs out there and now is the time to join. Since many trade workers will be retiring soon there is a great need for people with special skills: like electricians, crane operators, and welders, to replace the workers who are retiring.
In the medical industries field there is a great shortage of MRI techs, Radiology Techs, EEG techs, RN's (even with a 2 year voc liscense), surgical techs etc. And don't forget about the computer industry. (Think about Bill Gates.)
Also there are a lot of excellent on line schools out there that offer just as much as the brick and morder schools do but for a much less price.
We as a country need to stop the strangle hold that 4 year universities and colleges have on us. As someone who is suffering with student loan debt even many years after graduating from an overpriced over inflated 4 year university, I know the importance of giving my children the advantage of training for a good job without the burden of large student loan debt. With the US fluctuating job market, it is often a crap shoot on wheither or not one can find a high enough paying job to payback his/her student loans. If one cannot, forget about any kind of financial future such as being able to buy a house. There are many, like me, who are working in jobs in which we do not even use our 4 year degree(s). When I first started working in the health care field no one cared that I had a BA degree in Journalism. That would not even get me a job as a Patient Services Rep. I had to work my way up to that. What hospital employers cared about is what kind of experience I had. Up to 45% of us are working in jobs in which are degrees do not apply.
So unless you are going onto law school, medical school, or a career in social work. Forget about it.
It is time as a nation that we stopped letting 4 year institutions of learning bleed us dry.
Budget Woes make it more difficult to achieve a college degreee..
"State economies continue to flounder, and as schools prepare for more tough times, many admit that the end of troubles—for both traditional and transfer students—is nowhere in sight."
And yet, the illegal alien apologists have decided that this is the time to push for the "rights" of undocumented students to access a shrinking and competitive resource.
It is becoming increasingly more difficult for qualified and talented US citizens to achieve a college degree, based on rising costs, reduced aid and a faltering economy. Why would we want to rob our own legacy to reward those who defied the rules and came here illegally? It defies imagination.
Now is perhaps the time to enact federal standards for all schools that receive federal aid that in order to matriculate, you must either be a US citizen, legal permanent resident, or a lawfully admitted foreign student with proof of income to be self-sufficient and a guarantee (perhaps posting a bond) that the student will leave the US upon graduation as agreed?
The good side to this is that standards for admission will increase, something that is long overdue. Not everyone is cut out for college, and those who can't maintain a decent B average, shouldn't be wasting taxpayer resources.
advertisement





