Sunday, November 8, 2009

Education

New GI Bill Could Bring More College Benefits

Congress is considering proposals from Sen. Jim Webb and Sen. John McCain

Posted June 12, 2008

Sinking in education debt, Friends University freshman Amariee Collins was intrigued by Air Force ads promising to help pay tuition. So, shortly after the 9/11 terrorist attack, the Wichita, Kan., student deferred her dream of a degree and volunteered for active duty. Four years of stateside service later, she enrolled at the University of Houston and made a heartbreaking discovery: She still couldn't afford to attend college debt free. The Montgomery GI Bill would cover only about $11,000 of the school's $18,000 annual cost.

Amariee Collins (left) wants an increase in the education benefits offered to soldiers such as this group from a White House ceremony.
Amariee Collins (left) wants an increase in the education benefits offered to soldiers such as this group from a White House ceremony.

"I could be mad," the 25-year-old pre-med major says now. But she's choosing to funnel her frustration into action. At her part-time job at the campus veterans' center, she warns would-be soldiers about the reality of the education benefits. And she's rallying support for a controversial bill in Congress that would pay nearly all costs for a local public university for post-9/11 veterans.

Americans brought up on the lore of the original GI Bill, which raised millions of World War II veterans into the middle class by offering nearly free rides to universities as expensive as Harvard, are often surprised to learn that tuition inflation has so outstripped today's benefits from the bill.

Many of those are young people like Collins, who respond to recruiting ads promising more than $70,000 to pay for college. They often fail to read the fine print or understand the impact of tuition inflation. Since 2002, for example, the government has raised the standard academic-year education payment by a total of $1,800 to cover inflation. Meanwhile, the cost of attending a public university has risen by about $4,200, and the cost of a private university has risen by more than $7,000. Even more surprising to many are the controversies and presidential politicking bubbling in Washington over a bipartisan effort to give today's 1.4 million active-duty soldiers and 500,000 post-9/11 veterans something close to a debt-free degree.

A bill overwhelmingly passed by the Senate would give post-9/11 veterans 15 years to claim four academic years' worth of payments covering tuition at their state's most expensive public university, textbooks, and rent for a two-bedroom townhouse. Students who wanted to attend a more expensive private college could collect a check for the amount of their state university's tuition and then get a one-for-one federal match for every dollar in scholarship their private school offered. The bill was spearheaded by Sen. Jim Webb, a Vietnam veteran and former secretary of the Navy, and is backed by a bipartisan group of 58 senators, a majority of representatives, most major veterans' organizations, hundreds of university officials, and a Who's Who of retired generals. "There is unanimous opinion on the Hill and in the administration that improvements are needed," says Colin Powell, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and secretary of state and a backer of the bill.

Webb, a Virginia Democrat, notes that studies show the original GI Bill repaid at least $5 to taxpayers for every $1 spent on benefits. "You don't lose money when you pour it in somebody's head," he says. "The people who have been serving since 9/11 have given more than anyone in their generation. They have earned the same benefits as their grandparents."

The bill has been at least temporarily stymied, however, by a debate over just what improvements are needed and how much generosity the nation can afford. Leading the opposition: a formidable array including President Bush, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, and Sen. John McCain, a Vietnam veteran and the presumptive Republican nominee for president.

Gates and other brass are lobbying against Webb's bill, arguing it is so generous that it would make it harder for the Pentagon to persuade experienced soldiers to re-enlist. The Congressional Budget Office predicted the proposal could reduce the re-enlistment rate by about 16 percent, likely forcing the military to pony up billions more in bonuses or other re-enlistment sweeteners to keep its best soldiers in the midst of a war. Bush has expressed concerns about the costs and promised a veto if the House's fiscally conservative "Blue Dog" Democrats follow through with threats to pay for the bill with a "Patriot Tax" on those with incomes over $500,000.

Counterplan. McCain and several other Republican senators drafted a lower-cost and re-enlistment-friendlier bill that would bump up the basic education benefit by almost $3,000 a year and add another $4,200 a year for soldiers who stayed in the service for at least 12 years. In response to requests from the Pentagon, the alternative bill would also allow soldiers who served at least six years to transfer some of their unused education benefits to their spouse or children.

Reader Comments

appreciate

just appreciate this new bill because if alot us here in iraq come home cannt go to school or get a job for those not saying in trust me we will turn the civilian world upside down, u know wat am talking about, if u did know the country needs us so wat if the country pays more for our best interest.you know what it like to see ur body blown up in peaces and have to take him up, let me say this we are here trying to weedout these bad apple before they reach the state so its in our country best interest to give us wat we need

12-5-2008 Merry Christmas

Financial Flop heard around the world. Now with the whole economy in the toilet, I wonder how this is going to alter any proposed plans for corrective measures taken to aid in college tuition for ANY military vets regardless of pre-post 9/11. I've been out since just before 9/11 (that's my birthday too actually). Family and other obligations have kept me from persuing my own interests up to this point. Now that I get a chance to persue my education, I am absolutely frightened at the idea that it won't happen at all. I must understand that we are all in this together though, I like the idea of the University of choice (whichever that be) lowering their cost to veterans. This would be an excellent idea in my opinion. Hopefully it's not a pie in the sky idea though. If the military loses retention because of it, then at least they are not spending all the money it would take to put a student through a 4 year University and possibly housing food at full price. I would love it if they did, but I understand now more than ever that money is not growing on the branches. We need the money in so many places it's not funny at all. The money saved by the military in the joint scratching of backs by the University/Government/Military could be used for bells and whistles on re-enlistment bonuses for those who decide to stay in. All that said, I hope I can go to school at all. This is a bad time for us all, in the finance department as well as hope for a good future.

The bitter vets that are against this that are proven wrong and are also wrong in wishing their misery on those who serve in the uniform that they wore. Brotherly kindness would be a first. Taking joy in your fellow service men and womens awarded an education for blood and sacrifice is core of military service. You display none of this and disgrace the uniform. Shame on you!

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

advertisement

From Simpletuition

FIND STUDENT LOANS

$

U.S. News & World Report student loan comparison by:

advertisement

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.