Sunday, July 12, 2009

Small Business & Entrepreneurs

Is a Small-Business Tax Cut Coming?

Entrepreneurs may have to wait a while for some of Obama's campaign promises

Posted November 24, 2008

Now that the presidential election is over, what can small-business owners expect?

On one hand, they now have a president-elect who campaigned hard on several policy proposals that could have huge economic benefits for millions of small-business owners. Then again, they might have to wait a long time to see those proposals turned into policy and legislation.

Barack Obama made a number of campaign promises to appeal to the small-business vote. One of the most significant of those promises was a plan to waive the capital-gains tax for all start-up businesses. The capital-gains tax applies to both individuals and corporations and cuts into the profits you gain from noninventory assets such as stocks or real estate.

How much would this help small businesses?

The capital-gains tax hits small-business owners specifically the hardest when it comes to selling one's business. Up to 15 percent of the profit that a business's assets have accrued over more than a one-year period can be taxed when they are sold. Obama would raise this tax to 25 percent for people in the highest tax bracket. His proposal to waive the tax for start-ups is meant to relieve certain small-business owners of a greater burden.

But some disagree about how much relief Obama's proposal would bring. Carving out an exception for just start-up business owners—and not other small businesses—could be seen as a loophole in a system that already has many. "You want to make the tax code friendlier, but you don't want to make it more complicated," says Thomas Sullivan, who was chief counsel for advocacy at the Small Business Administration until October.

Having to worry about whether or not your business would meet the definition of a "start-up" can be taxing in itself. "You want businesses to focus on running their business. You don't want them to devote any brain cells to focusing on the tax code," says Tim Kane, an economist and a senior fellow at the Kauffman Foundation.

Still, at a time when investment in start-up businesses is seen as declining, waiving the capital-gains tax could provide a shot in the arm to stimulate more investors to take risks. "If you lower the rate, you are freeing up more cash into the economy," says Sullivan.

Will Obama follow through with it?

One complicating factor is that neither Obama nor his team has been completely clear on exactly what he would do with the capital-gains tax. In his speech at the Democratic National Convention, Obama said, "I will eliminate capital-gains taxes for the small businesses and the start-ups that will create the high-wage, high-tech jobs of tomorrow." But a version of his plan for small business available on his website reads that he would "eliminate all capital-gains taxes on investments made in small and start-up businesses [emphasis added]." He also has never made clear exactly how the plan would define a "start-up business."

That vagueness could be a sign of lack of priority. "The vagueness of a campaign is not something we should trust to be turned into policy," says Kane.

Obama's platform also had several other promises for small businesses, such as an increase in funding for the Small Business Administration and an annual $250 million investment in "public-private incubators" meant to spur entrepreneurial activity in disadvantaged communities.

Would it be a priority early on in an Obama administration?

The financial crisis and the debate over another stimulus package, the Detroit bailout, and foreign policy are all likely to eclipse small-business issues. "He's going to go right after the bailout. [Small-business] stuff is going to be on the back burner," says Nick Ragone, author of Presidents' Most Wanted. While many industries from life insurance to the automotive companies have been asking for a piece of the bailout money, it is harder for small businesses to get Washington's ear. Large businesses make the argument that the economy can't afford for them to go bankrupt. That does not come as easy for the large but disparate small-business sector, says Kane. "Small businesses are not allowed to say that sort of thing." Congress may also be loath to pass an effective capital-gains tax cut if a great deal of money is spent on stimulus and other projects, adds Kane.

Second, even after the big-ticket items take up political capital, Obama and congressional Democrats may choose to focus on other constituencies. In particular, many Democrats hope to pass the Employee Free Choice Act, a bill heavily favored by unions and labor advocacy groups, seen as a core Democratic constituency. "Small business historically has been more a Republican constituency. He will make good on his constituency before traditionally Republican constituencies," says Ragone.

But others are more optimistic. "The good news is that small business was absolutely a focal point of both campaigns," says Sullivan. Republicans would most likely support a capital-gains tax elimination for start-ups, making it a potential bipartisan issue. Because policies for small business were discussed so much in the campaign, they may have to at least be discussed early in the next administration. Otherwise, "why would Obama have focused so much on small business?" asks Sullivan.

Reader Comments

Every tax cut since 1913

Has resulted in economic depression, recession, or market bubbles.

Simply put lowering taxes encourages business owners to remove money from businesses that are running well, and making decent, but not enormous profits. Keeping taxes high points business owners in the direction of keeping money in the business, investing it in equipment, hiring more people, making more of what they sell, having more people working who can buy what they sell, opening new locations etc.

If a small business owner sees that if he takes a million dollars out of that business as income for himself, he is going to magically see it shrink by whatever the top marginal rate is, but if he keeps it inside the business, he is still going to have some asset that is worth a million dollars, and even increase the sort of assets that will create more wealth.

This is the diversion that conservatives often engage in, they comfuse wealth creation with profit creation.

In the last 80 plus years, every large tax cut has led to recession, depression, economic bubbles, small tax cuts have created relatively stagnant economies (the period between the tax cuts made by Lyndon Johnson and well into the Nixon administration saw a zero market growth), the Reagan administration was bookended with recessions and then the S&L failures, the slight tax increase of the Clinton years led to the greatest market growth in history.

Between 1921 and 1925, conservative administration gave three tax cuts, the first two relatively small, but the one in 1925 was relatively large, down to 25 percent. The Great Depression followed.

Why.

Because low taxes encourage diferent investment behaviors. High taxes create incentives for the business owner to earn money the hard way. By creating and growing businesses, hiring new employees, opening new plants or stores. Anything to actually avoid paying the taxes.

On the other hand when taxes are low, business owners are inclined to take money out of those businesses and then go looking for other ways of making money. Usually they do so by investing in the stock market, usually looking for some hot sector that other people seem to be making a bundle in and then they go right to those markets as well which heats them until they form a nice big bubble that is ready to burst and usually does.

High taxes encourage earning money by creating something of long term value that will bring in a small, but regular profit consistantly over time. It creates wealth for the entire community.

Low taxes encourage the speculative behavior that has caused every cycle of boom and bust for the last 90 years. Consistantly. Like clockwork.

David Stockman, Reagans economic czar, reports that when they they first started cutting taxes, they waited for signs that those who got the large cuts would start REINVESTING their money into their businesses. It never happened.They had no incentive to do so.

Blazing the new frontier under Obama

Just curious....what are we risking? House, job, income, savings/retirement, freedom of choice for socialism? In Obama's speech he referenced taking a risk and not for the fainthearted, etc...what risk are we taking and what risk is he taking? How will he suffer in any way shape or form? Popularity vote?

why are small business tax cuts bad and how do they negatively affect the economy???

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

advertisement

Retirement Widget

Get Retirement News on Your Site

Click here to add a Usnews.com retirement widget.

advertisement

Get Stock Quotes

America's Best Healthy Places to Retire

U.S. News writers profile 10 healthy retirement spots around the country.

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.